ArticleBMC medical research methodology2014
Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Development and applications of the Anaesthetists' Non-Technical Skills behavioural marker system: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic review of brief, freely accessible, and valid self-report measures for substance use disorders and treatment.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2023Pooled it
- A Systematic Review on Clinimetric Properties of Play Instruments for Occupational Therapy Practice.Occupational therapy international · 2020Pooled it
- A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review.Systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Methods used to address fidelity of receipt in health intervention research: a citation analysis and systematic review.BMC health services research · 2016Pooled it
- BibliZap: An exploratory evaluation of an automated multi-level citation searching tool for systematic and rapid reviews.Research synthesis methods · 2026Article
- The Trial Bank initiative to promote trustworthy living evidence for medication safety (PROMISE) of children: design and pilot validation.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Performance of the Leicester risk assessment and Leicester practice risk scores for assessing the risk of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes or prediabetes in diverse populations: protocol for a systematic review of published validations and updates.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2026Review
- Supplementary search methods versus bibliographic database searching to identify studies and study reports.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
- A New Process Model of Study Identification Specific to the Identification of Randomised Studies for Systematic Reviews of Medical Interventions.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2025Article
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Automated citation searching in systematic review production: A simulation study.Research synthesis methods · 2025Article
- Article
- Evidence gaps in conservative non-pharmacological interventions and guideline implementation for high-burden non-communicable diseases: protocol for an overview of reviews.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2024Article
- Establishing the measurement and psychometrics of medical student feedback literacy (IMPROVE-FL): A research protocol.PloS one · 2024Article
- What can the citations of systematic reviews of ethical literature tell us about their use?-an explorative empirical analysis of 31 reviews.Systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Insights from using an outcomes measurement properties search filter and conducting citation searches to locate psychometric articles of tools used to measure context attributes.BMC research notes · 2023Article
- What Constitutes Student Well-Being: A Scoping Review Of Students' Perspectives.Child indicators research · 2023Article
- Development and applications of the anaesthetists' non-technical skills behavioural marker system: protocol for a systematic review.BMJ open · 2022Article
- A suggested data structure for transparent and repeatable reporting of bibliographic searching.Campbell systematic reviews · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe value of citation searches as part of the systematic review process is currently unknown. While the major guides to conducting systematic reviews state that citation searching should be carried out in addition to searching bibliographic databases there are still few studies in the literature that support this view. Rather than using a predefined search strategy to retrieve studies, citation searching uses known relevant papers to identify further papers.
methodsWe describe a case study about the effectiveness of using the citation sources Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science and OVIDSP MEDLINE to identify records for inclusion in a systematic review.We used the 40 included studies identified by traditional database searches from one systematic review of interventions for multiple risk behaviours. We searched for each of the included studies in the four citation sources to retrieve the details of all papers that have cited these studies.We carried out two analyses; the first was to examine the overlap between the four citation sources to identify which citation tool was the most useful; the second was to investigate whether the citation searches identified any relevant records in addition to those retrieved by the original database searches.
resultsThe highest number of citations was retrieved from Google Scholar (1680), followed by Scopus (1173), then Web of Science (1095) and lastly OVIDSP (213). To retrieve all the records identified by the citation tracking searching all four resources was required. Google Scholar identified the highest number of unique citations.The citation tracking identified 9 studies that met the review's inclusion criteria. Eight of these had already been identified by the traditional databases searches and identified in the screening process while the ninth was not available in any of the databases when the original searches were carried out. It would, however, have been identified by two of the database search strategies if searches had been carried out later.
conclusionsBased on the results from this investigation, citation searching as a supplementary search method for systematic reviews may not be the best use of valuable time and resources. It would be useful to verify these findings in other reviews.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.