Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24893939›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2014

Functional genomics of the 9p21.3 locus for atherosclerosis: clarity or confusion?

Hsiao-Huei Chen, Naif A M Almontashiri, Darlène Antoine, Alexandre F R Stewart

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Omics research in atherosclerosis.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Regulatory Non-coding RNAs in Atherosclerosis.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The genetics of diabetic complications.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2015
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hsiao-Huei ChenOttawa Hospital Research Institute, 451 Smyth Road, RGN Hall, Rm 2422, K1H 8M5, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Naif A M Almontashiri
Darlène Antoine
Alexandre F R Stewart
University of Ottawa · CAOttawa Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 9p21.3 locus was the first to yield to genome-wide association studies (GWAS) seeking common genetic variants predisposing to increased risk of coronary artery atherosclerotic disease (CAD). The 59 single nucleotide polymorphisms that show highest association with CAD are clustered in a region 100,000 to 150,000 base pairs 5' to the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors CDKN2B (coding for p15(ink4b)) and CDKN2A (coding for p16(ink4a) and p14(ARF)). This region also covers the 3' end of a long noncoding RNA transcribed antisense to CDKN2B (CDKN2BAS, aka ANRIL for antisense noncoding RNA at the ink4 locus) whose expression has been linked to chromatin remodeling at the locus. Despite intensive investigation over the past 7 years, the functional significance of the 9p21.3 locus remains elusive. Other variants at this locus have been associated with glaucoma, glioma, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, diseases that implicate tissue-resident macrophages. Here, we review the evidence that genetic variants at 9p21.3 disrupt tissue-specific enhancers and propose new insights to guide future studies.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisChromosomes, Human, Pair 9Genome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumansPhenotypeSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID24893939
OpenAlexW2006450437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.