Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24893864›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2014

Type 2 diabetes-related genetic risk scores associated with variations in fasting plasma glucose and development of impaired glucose homeostasis in the prospective DESIR study.

Martine Vaxillaire, Loïc Yengo, Stéphane Lobbens, Ghislain Rocheleau, Elodie Eury, Olivier Lantieri, Michel Marre, Beverley Balkau, Amélie Bonnefond, Philippe Froguel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Martine VaxillaireEuropean Genomic Institute for Diabetes, FR 3508, Lille, France, martine.vaxillaire@good.ibl.fr.
Loïc Yengo
Stéphane Lobbens
Ghislain Rocheleau
Elodie Eury
Olivier Lantieri
Michel Marre
Beverley Balkau
Amélie Bonnefond
Philippe Froguel
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité de Lille · FRCentre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations · FREuropean Genomic Institute for Diabetes · FRHammersmith Hospital · GBInserm · FR

Funding

Medical Research Council G1002084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisGenome-wide association studies have firmly established 65 independent European-derived loci associated with type 2 diabetes and 36 loci contributing to variations in fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Using individual data from the Data from an Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome (DESIR) prospective study, we evaluated the contribution of three genetic risk scores (GRS) to variations in metabolic traits, and to the incidence and prevalence of impaired fasting glycaemia (IFG) and type 2 diabetes.

methodsThree GRS (GRS-1, 65 type 2 diabetes-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]; GRS-2, GRS-1 combined with 24 FPG-raising SNPs; and GRS-3, FPG-raising SNPs alone) were analysed in 4,075 DESIR study participants. GRS-mediated effects on longitudinal variations in quantitative traits were assessed in 3,927 nondiabetic individuals using multivariate linear mixed models, and on the incidence and prevalence of hyperglycaemia at 9 years using Cox and logistic regression models. The contribution of each GRS to risk prediction was evaluated using the C-statistic and net reclassification improvement (NRI) analysis.

resultsThe two most inclusive GRS were significantly associated with increased FPG (β = 0.0011 mmol/l per year per risk allele, p GRS-1  = 8.2 × 10(-5) and p GRS-2  = 6.0 × 10(-6)), increased incidence of IFG and type 2 diabetes (per allele: HR GRS-1 1.03, p = 4.3 × 10(-9) and HR GRS-2 1.04, p = 1.0 × 10(-16)), and the 9 year prevalence (OR GRS-1 1.13 [95% CI 1.10, 1.17], p = 1.9 × 10(-14) for type 2 diabetes only; OR GRS-2 1.07 [95% CI 1.05, 1.08], p = 7.8 × 10(-25), for IFG and type 2 diabetes). No significant interaction was found between GRS-1 or GRS-2 and potential confounding factors. Each GRS yielded a modest, but significant, improvement in overall reclassification rates (NRI GRS-1 17.3%, p = 6.6 × 10(-7); NRI GRS-2 17.6%, p = 4.2 × 10(-7); NRI GRS-3 13.1%, p = 1.7 × 10(-4)). CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationPolygenic scores based on combined genetic information from type 2 diabetes risk and FPG variation contribute to discriminating middle-aged individuals at risk of developing type 2 diabetes in a general population.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdultAgedAllelesBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHomeostasisHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesWhite PeopleBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID24893864
OpenAlexW2024546585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.