Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24893863›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2014

Contrasting the clinical care and outcomes of 2,622 children with type 1 diabetes less than 6 years of age in the United States T1D Exchange and German/Austrian DPV registries.

David M Maahs, Julia M Hermann, Stephanie N DuBose, Kellee M Miller, Bettina Heidtmann, Linda A DiMeglio, Birgit Rami-Merhar, Roy W Beck, Edith Schober, William V Tamborlane and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Determinants, implementation strategies, and mechanisms of the 4T Program.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A1C: Episode 2.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

David M MaahsBarbara Davis Centre for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, CO, USA.
Julia M Hermann
Stephanie N DuBose
Kellee M Miller
Bettina Heidtmann
Linda A DiMeglio
Birgit Rami-Merhar
Roy W Beck
Edith Schober
William V Tamborlane
Thomas M Kapellen
Reinhard W Holl
DPV Initiative
T1D Exchange Clinic Network
Jaeb Center for Health Research · USMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversität Ulm · DEDiabetes Australia · AUIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USKatholisches Kinderkrankenhaus Wilhelmstift · DELeipzig University · DEYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisThe study aimed to compare participant characteristics, treatment modalities and clinical outcomes in registry participants less than 6 years old.

methodsParticipant characteristics, treatment modalities and clinical outcomes (HbA1c, severe hypoglycaemia [SH] and diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA]) as well as frequencies of attaining HbA1c goals in line with the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (<7.5% [<58 mmol/mol]) and ADA (<8.5% [<69 mmol/mol]) were compared.

resultsInsulin pump use was more frequent (74% vs 50%, p < 0.001) and HbA1c levels lower in the Prospective Diabetes Follow-up Registry (DPV) than in the T1D Exchange (T1DX) (mean 7.4% vs 8.2%, p < 0.001). A lower HbA1c level was seen in the DPV compared with the T1DX for both pump users (p < 0.001) and injection users (p < 0.001). More children from DPV were meeting the recommended HbA1c goals, compared with children from T1DX (HbA1c <7.5%: 56% vs 22%, p < 0.001; HbA1c <8.5%: 90% vs 66%, p < 0.001). The adjusted odds of having an HbA1c level <7.5% or <8.5% were 4.2 (p < 0.001) and 3.6 (p < 0.001) higher for the DPV than the T1DX, respectively. The frequency of SH did not differ between registries or by HbA1c, whereas the frequency of DKA was higher for the T1DX and greater in those with higher HbA1c levels. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationDPV data indicate that an HbA1c of <7.5% can frequently be achieved in children with type 1 diabetes who are under 6 years old. An improved metabolic control of type 1 diabetes in young patients appears to decrease the risk of DKA without increasing SH. The greater frequency of suboptimal control in young patients in the T1DX compared with the DPV is not fully explained by a less frequent use of insulin pumps and may relate to the higher HbA1c targets that are recommended for this age group in the USA.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseAustriaChild, PreschoolDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetic KetoacidosisFemaleGermanyGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInfantInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsMaleProspective StudiesBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID24893863
OpenAlexW2012079465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.