Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24893088›Full record

ArticleJAMA2014

Association between prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and survival in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction between 30% and 35%.

Sana M Al-Khatib, Anne S Hellkamp, Gregg C Fonarow, Daniel B Mark, Lesley H Curtis, Adrian F Hernandez, Kevin J Anstrom, Eric D Peterson, Gillian D Sanders, Hussein R Al-Khalidi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Left ventricular ejection fraction: how to improve an established index?The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sana M Al-KhatibDuke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina3Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Anne S HellkampDuke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Gregg C FonarowAhmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, Ronald Reagan-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Daniel B MarkDuke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina3Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Lesley H CurtisDuke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina2Center for Clinical and Genetic Economics, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina4Division of General.
Adrian F HernandezDuke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina3Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Kevin J AnstromDuke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Eric D PetersonDuke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina3Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Gillian D SandersDuke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Hussein R Al-KhalidiDuke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Bradley G HammillDuke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Paul A HeidenreichStanford University, Palo Alto Veteran's Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Stephen C HammillDuke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina2Center for Clinical and Genetic Economics, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina7Mayo Clinic, Rochest.

Funding

ICD Therapy in Patients with Congestive Heart FailureR01HL093071 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI AL-KHATIB, SANA M. · 2009 to 2012
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1R01-HL093071-01A1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL093071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceClinical trials of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have included a minority of patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 30% and 35%. Because a large number of ICDs in the United States are implanted in such patients, it is important to study survival associated with this therapy.

objectiveTo characterize patients with LVEF between 30% and 35% and compare the survival of those with and without ICDs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsRetrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD registry (January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2007) with an LVEF between 30% and 35% who received an ICD during a heart failure hospitalization and similar patients in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) database (January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2009) with no ICD. The analysis was repeated in patients with an LVEF less than 30%. There were 3120 patients with an LVEF between 30% and 35% (816 in matched cohorts) and 4578 with an LVEF less than 30% (2176 in matched cohorts). Propensity score matching and Cox models were applied. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; data were obtained from Medicare claims through December 31, 2011.

resultsThere were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the matched groups (n = 408 for both groups). Among patients with an LVEF between 30% and 35%, there were 248 deaths in the ICD Registry group, within a median follow-up of 4.4 years (interquartile range, 2.7-4.9) and 249 deaths in the GWTG HF group, within a median follow-up of 2.9 years (interquartile range, 2.1-4.4). The risk of all-cause mortality in patients with an LVEF between 30% and 35% and an ICD was significantly lower than that in matched patients without an ICD (3-year mortality rates: 51.4% vs 55.0%; hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.69-0.99]; P = .04). Presence of an ICD also was associated with better survival in patients with an LVEF less than 30% (3-year mortality rates: 45.0% vs 57.6%; 634 and 660 total deaths; hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.65-0.81]; P < .001) (P = .20 for interaction). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for heart failure and with an LVEF between 30% and 35% and less than 30%, survival at 3 years was better in patients who received a prophylactic ICD than in comparable patients with no ICD. These findings support guideline recommendations to implant prophylactic ICDs in eligible patients with an LVEF of 35% or less.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantableVentricular Dysfunction, LeftAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMedicarePropensity ScoreRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRiskSurvival AnalysisUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24893088
PMCPMC4122230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.