Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24892551›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Role of leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin 2 as a biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hirohisa Okabe, Evan Delgado, Jung Min Lee, Jing Yang, Hiroki Kinoshita, Hiromitsu Hayashi, Allan Tsung, Jaideep Behari, Toru Beppu, Hideo Baba and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. LECT2: A pleiotropic and promising hepatokine, from bench to bedside.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. LECT2 Protects Nile Tilapia (Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Viruses · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hirohisa OkabeDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Evan DelgadoDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jung Min LeeDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jing YangDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Hiroki KinoshitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hiromitsu HayashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Allan TsungDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jaideep BehariDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Toru BeppuDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan; Department of Multidisciplinary Treatment for Gastroenterological Cancer, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hideo BabaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Satdarshan P MongaDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
University of Pittsburgh · USKumamoto University · JPKumamoto University Hospital · JPUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

Role of Wnt/Beta-Catenin Signaling in Liver DevelopmentR01DK062277 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Satdarshan Singh Monga · 2004 to 2026
$9.0M
Targeting beta-catenin in liver pathology: Novel Interactions, Novel ParadigmsR01DK100287 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MONGA, SATDARSHAN SINGH · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
Angiopathy Training GrantT32HL094295 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MARS, WENDY MICHELLE · 2010 to 2014
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL094295NIDDK NIH HHS 1R01DK62277NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062277NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100287NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK100287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to identify a secreted biomarker for β-catenin activation commonly seen in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). By examination of our previously published genearray of hepatocyte-specific β-catenin knockout (KO) livers, we identified secreted factors whose expression may be β-catenin-dependent. We verified expression and secretion of the leading factor in HCC cells transfected with mutated (Hep3BS33Y)-β-catenin. Serum levels of biomarker were next investigated in a mouse model of HCC with β-catenin gene (Ctnnb1) mutations and eventually in HCC patients. Leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin-2 (LECT2) expression was decreased in KO livers. Hep3BS33Y expressed and secreted more LECT2 in media as compared to Hep3BWT. Mice developing HCC with Ctnnb1 mutations showed significantly higher serum LECT2 levels. However patients with CTNNB1 mutations showed LECT2 levels of 54.28 ± 22.32 ng/mL (Mean ± SD; n = 8) that were insignificantly different from patients with non-neoplastic chronic liver disease (32.8 ± 21.1 ng/mL; n = 15) or healthy volunteers (33.2 ± 7.2 ng/mL; n = 11). Intriguingly, patients without β-catenin mutations showed significantly higher serum LECT2 levels (54.26 ± 22.25 ng/mL; n = 46). While β-catenin activation was evident in a subset of non-mutant β-catenin HCC group with high LECT2 expression, serum LECT2 was unequivocally similar between β-catenin-active and -normal group. Further analysis showed that LECT2 levels greater than 50 ng/ml diagnosed HCC in patients irrespective of β-catenin mutations with specificity of 96.1% and positive predictive value of 97.0%. Thus, LECT2 is regulated by β-catenin in HCC in both mice and men, but serum LECT2 reflects β-catenin activity only in mice. Serum LECT2 could be a potential biomarker of HCC in patients.

Indexed as

Animalsbeta CateninBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLiver NeoplasmsMiceMice, Knockoutbeta CateninBiomarkers, TumorIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLECT2 protein, humanLect2 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID24892551
PMCPMC4043833
OpenAlexW2013273539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.