Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24892020›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of critical care medicine2014

Arterial vs venous blood gas differences during hemorrhagic shock.

Kristopher Burton Williams, Ashley Britton Christmas, Brant Todd Heniford, Ronald Fong Sing, Joseph Messick

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of critical care medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Agreement of pCOIntensive care medicine experimental · 2023
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Acute diarrhea-induced shock during alcohol withdrawal: a case study.The Journal of international medical research · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristopher Burton WilliamsKristopher Burton Williams, Ashley Britton Christmas, Brant Todd Heniford, Ronald Fong Sing, Joseph Messick, Department of Surgery, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC 28204, United States.
Ashley Britton ChristmasKristopher Burton Williams, Ashley Britton Christmas, Brant Todd Heniford, Ronald Fong Sing, Joseph Messick, Department of Surgery, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC 28204, United States.
Brant Todd HenifordKristopher Burton Williams, Ashley Britton Christmas, Brant Todd Heniford, Ronald Fong Sing, Joseph Messick, Department of Surgery, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC 28204, United States.
Ronald Fong SingKristopher Burton Williams, Ashley Britton Christmas, Brant Todd Heniford, Ronald Fong Sing, Joseph Messick, Department of Surgery, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC 28204, United States.
Joseph MessickKristopher Burton Williams, Ashley Britton Christmas, Brant Todd Heniford, Ronald Fong Sing, Joseph Messick, Department of Surgery, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC 28204, United States.
Carolinas Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo characterize differences of arterial (ABG) and venous (VBG) blood gas analysis in a rabbit model of hemorrhagic shock.

methodsFollowing baseline arterial and venous blood gas analysis, fifty anesthetized, ventilated New Zealand white rabbits were hemorrhaged to and maintained at a mean arterial pressure of 40 mmHg until a state of shock was obtained, as defined by arterial pH ≤ 7.2 and base deficit ≤ -15 mmol/L. Simultaneous ABG and VBG were obtained at 3 minute intervals. Comparisons of pH, base deficit, pCO2, and arteriovenous (a-v) differences were then made between ABG and VBG at baseline and shock states. Statistical analysis was applied where appropriate with a significance of P < 0.05.

resultsAll 50 animals were hemorrhaged to shock status and euthanized; no unexpected loss occurred. Significant differences were noted between baseline and shock states in blood gases for the following parameters: pH was significantly decreased in both arterial (7.39 ± 0.12 to 7.14 ± 0.18) and venous blood gases (7.35 ± 0.15 to 6.98 ± 0.26, P < 0.05), base deficit was significantly increased for arterial (-0.9 ± 3.9 mEq/L vs -17.8 ± 2.2 mEq/L) and venous blood gasses (-0.8 ± 3.8 mEq/L vs -15.3 ± 4.1 mEq/L, P < 0.05). pCO2 trends (baseline to shock) demonstrated a decrease in arterial blood (40.0 ± 9.1 mmHg vs 28.9 ± 7.1 mmHg) but an increase in venous blood (46.0 ± 10.1 mmHg vs 62.8 ± 15.3 mmHg), although these trends were non-significant. For calculated arteriovenous differences between baseline and shock states, only the pCO2 difference was shown to be significant during shock.

conclusionIn this rabbit model, significant differences exist in blood gas measurements for arterial and venous blood after hemorrhagic shock. A widened pCO2 a-v difference during hemorrhage, reflective of poor tissue oxygenation, may be a better indicator of impending shock.

Indexed as

Arterial blood gasesBase deficitHemorrhagic shockpHVenous blood gases

Identifiers

PMID24892020
PMCPMC4038813
OpenAlexW1850534401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.