ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2014
Sea change in open science and data sharing: leadership by industry.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Concordance between clinical trial data use request proposals and corresponding publications: A cross-sectional study.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2025Article
- Clinical trial data sharing: a cross-sectional study of outcomes associated with two U.S. National Institutes of Health models.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Characteristics of available studies and dissemination of research using major clinical data sharing platforms.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2021Review
- Open Data Revolution in Clinical Research: Opportunities and Challenges.Clinical and translational science · 2020Review
- Healthcare data scientist qualifications, skills, and job focus: a content analysis of job postings.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Article
- Submissions from the SPRINT Data Analysis Challenge on clinical risk prediction: a cross-sectional evaluation.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Individual Patient-Level Data Sharing for Continuous Learning: A Strategy for Trial Data Sharing.NAM perspectives · 2019Review
- Overview and experience of the YODA Project with clinical trial data sharing after 5 years.Scientific data · 2018Article
- Clinical Trial Participants' Views of the Risks and Benefits of Data Sharing.The New England journal of medicine · 2018Article
- Beyond open data: realising the health benefits of sharing data.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Article
- Clinical research data sharing: what an open science world means for researchers involved in evidence synthesis.Systematic reviews · 2016Article
- The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.The Milbank quarterly · 2016Article
- EFSPI/PSI working group on data sharing: accessing and working with pharmaceutical clinical trial patient level datasets - a primer for academic researchers.BMC medical research methodology · 2016Article
- Availability of Clinical Trial Data From Industry-Sponsored Cardiovascular Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2016Article
- Practicing partnered research.Journal of general internal medicine · 2014Article
- How to make more published research true.PLoS medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.