Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24891441›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2014

RecO and RecR are necessary for RecA loading in response to DNA damage and replication fork stress.

Justin S Lenhart, Eileen R Brandes, Jeremy W Schroeder, Roderick J Sorenson, Hollis D Showalter, Lyle A Simmons

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. DnaE uses strand displacement synthesis during Okazaki fragment repair.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A global perspective on the genomics ofMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  10. The Role of the RecFOR Complex in Genome Stability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Generation and Repair of Postreplication Gaps in Escherichia coli.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin S LenhartDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Eileen R BrandesDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Jeremy W SchroederDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Roderick J SorensonVahlteich Medicinal Chemistry Core, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Hollis D ShowalterVahlteich Medicinal Chemistry Core, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Lyle A SimmonsDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA lasimm@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN GENETICST32GM007544 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORAN, JOHN V. · 1985 to 2022
$11.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007544NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM007544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RecA is central to maintaining genome integrity in bacterial cells. Despite the near-ubiquitous conservation of RecA in eubacteria, the pathways that facilitate RecA loading and repair center assembly have remained poorly understood in Bacillus subtilis. Here, we show that RecA rapidly colocalizes with the DNA polymerase complex (replisome) immediately following DNA damage or damage-independent replication fork arrest. In Escherichia coli, the RecFOR and RecBCD pathways serve to load RecA and the choice between these two pathways depends on the type of damage under repair. We found in B. subtilis that the rapid localization of RecA to repair centers is strictly dependent on RecO and RecR in response to all types of damage examined, including a site-specific double-stranded break and damage-independent replication fork arrest. Furthermore, we provide evidence that, although RecF is not required for RecA repair center formation in vivo, RecF does increase the efficiency of repair center assembly, suggesting that RecF may influence the initial stages of RecA nucleation or filament extension. We further identify single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) as an additional component important for RecA repair center assembly. Truncation of the SSB C terminus impairs the ability of B. subtilis to form repair centers in response to damage and damage-independent fork arrest. With these results, we conclude that the SSB-dependent recruitment of RecOR to the replisome is necessary for loading and organizing RecA into repair centers in response to DNA damage and replication fork arrest.

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA RepairDNA ReplicationDNA, Single-StrandedGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMutationRec A RecombinasesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsUracil6-(4-hydroxyphenylhydrazino)uracilBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Single-StrandedGreen Fluorescent ProteinsRec A RecombinasesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRecR protein, BacteriaUracil

Identifiers

PMID24891441
PMCPMC4135682
OpenAlexW2113192763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.