Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24890883›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2014

Pushing the boundaries of ureteroscopy: current status and future perspectives.

Petrisor Geavlete, Razvan Multescu, Bogdan Geavlete

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02426931 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Tip-flexible Semi-rigid Ureterorenoscope Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of Renal Calculi < 3 cm - Efficacity Prospective Randomized Multicentre Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLing Li, MDRan2015 to 2015Enrolled280ConditionsRenal CalculiArmsthe tip-flexible ureterorenoscope, the classic flexible ureteroscope
NCT03040466 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Disposable to Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope for Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stone

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2014 to 2016Enrolled180ConditionsKidney Calculi, Ureter CalculiArmsreusable fiberoptic ureteroscope, disposable digital ureteroscope
NCT03105206 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter Prospective Research on the Treatment of Low Pole Renal Calculus by Flexible Ureteroscope

TypeobservationalSponsorChanghai HospitalRan2017 to 2019Enrolled1,100ConditionsRenal CalculusArmsFlexible Ureteroscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Micro-cost analysis of reusable compared to affordable single-use flexible ureteroscopes.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Petrisor GeavleteUrological Department, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Vitan Barzesti 13, Bucharest 042122, Romania.
Razvan MultescuUrological Department, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Vitan Barzesti 13, Bucharest 042122, Romania.
Bogdan GeavleteUrological Department, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Vitan Barzesti 13, Bucharest 042122, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial advances in ureteroscopy have resulted in the incorporation of this procedure into routine urological practice in many centres worldwide. Subsequently, an abundance of clinical data and technological progression have enabled the development of novel solutions that have increased the efficacy of ureteroscopy, and reduced associated morbidity and costs. In addition the indications for this retrograde approach have been expanded, and pyelocalyceal diverticulum, infundibular stenosis, urolithiasis in pregnant women or in patients with urinary diversions, as well as upper urinary tract tumours can now be managed using this methodology. New endoscopes are continuously developed, with different manufacturers choosing various technical solutions to further increase the efficacy and safety-and sometimes decrease costs-of ureteroscopy, including miniaturization, inclusion of digital optical systems and dual working channels, and the introduction of disposable apparatus. The holmium laser, currently the most-versatile energy source available, enables tissue incision, tumour ablation, and intracorporeal lithotripsy. Modern ancillary instruments are diverse, flexible, and durable, and novel devices used in daily clinical practice can minimize ascendant migration of stone fragments and, therefore, decrease the failure rate of the retrograde ureteroscopic approach. However, the peak of ureteroscopy evolution seems to remain distant, with further improvement of endoscopes and ancillary instruments, and robot-assisted ureteroscopy representing only some of the areas in which future developments are possible.

Indexed as

UreteroscopesUreteroscopyEquipment DesignHumansLithotripsyTreatment OutcomeUrolithiasisUrologic Diseases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.