Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24890836›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2014

Novel vaccination strategies against tuberculosis.

Peter Andersen, Stefan H E Kaufmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antigen 85B ofVaccines · 2026
    Review
  2. Applications of humanized mice inMolecular medicine reports · 2026
    Review
  3. Construction and characterization of novelInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The combination ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Enhancement of the immunogenicity of aIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Safety and Immunogenicity of RecombinantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. BCG Vaccine-The Road Not Taken.Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  20. Impact ofCells · 2022
    Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter AndersenStatens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Stefan H E KaufmannMax Planck Institute for Infection Biology, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology · DEStatens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tuberculosis (TB) pandemic continues to rampage despite widespread use of the BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guérin) vaccine. Novel vaccination strategies are urgently needed to arrest global transmission and prevent the uncontrolled development of multidrug-resistant forms of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Over the last two decades, considerable progress has been made in the field of vaccine development with numerous innovative preclinical candidates and more than a dozen vaccines in clinical trials. These vaccines are developed either as boosters of the current BCG vaccine or as novel prime vaccines to replace BCG. Given the enormous prevalence of latent TB infection, vaccines that are protective on top of an already established infection remain a high priority and a significant scientific challenge. Here we discuss the current state of TB vaccine research and development, our understanding of the underlying immunology, and the requirements for an efficient TB vaccine.

Indexed as

Tuberculosis VaccinesBCG VaccineHumansTuberculosisBCG VaccineTuberculosis Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID24890836
PMCPMC4031959
OpenAlexW2098979666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.