Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24890576›Full record

ReviewSeminars in dialysis

Guidelines for reporting case studies on extracorporeal treatments in poisonings: methodology.

Valéry Lavergne, Georges Ouellet, Josée Bouchard, Tais Galvao, Jan T Kielstein, Darren M Roberts, Salmaan Kanji, James B Mowry, Diane P Calello, Robert S Hoffman and 14 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in dialysis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Clinical Features of Patients Hospitalized for All Routes of Anthrax, 1880-2018: A Systematic Review.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Identifying Meningitis During an Anthrax Mass Casualty Incident: Systematic Review of Systemic Anthrax Since 1880.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Comment on "Cardiovascular and Adverse Effects of Glucagon for the Management of Suspected Beta Blocker Toxicity: a Case Series".Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Valéry LavergneDepartment of Medical Biology, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Georges Ouellet
Josée Bouchard
Tais Galvao
Jan T Kielstein
Darren M Roberts
Salmaan Kanji
James B Mowry
Diane P Calello
Robert S Hoffman
Sophie Gosselin
Thomas D Nolin
David S Goldfarb
Emmanuel A Burdmann
Paul I Dargan
Brian Scott Decker
Lotte C Hoegberg
Robert Maclaren
Bruno Megarbane
Kevin M Sowinski
Christopher Yates
Robert Mactier
Timothy Wiegand
Marc Ghannoum

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A literature review performed by the EXtracorporeal TReatments In Poisoning (EXTRIP) workgroup highlighted deficiencies in the existing literature, especially the reporting of case studies. Although general reporting guidelines exist for case studies, there are none in the specific field of extracorporeal treatments in toxicology. Our goal was to construct and propose a checklist that systematically outlines the minimum essential items to be reported in a case study of poisoned patients undergoing extracorporeal treatments. Through a modified two-round Delphi technique, panelists (mostly chosen from the EXTRIP workgroup) were asked to vote on the pertinence of a set of items to identify those considered minimally essential for reporting complete and accurate case reports. Furthermore, independent raters validated the clarity of each selected items between each round of voting. All case reports containing data on extracorporeal treatments in poisoning published in Medline in 2011 were reviewed during the external validation rounds. Twenty-one panelists (20 from the EXTRIP workgroup and an invited expert on pharmacology reporting guidelines) participated in the modified Delphi technique. This group included journal editors and experts in nephrology, clinical toxicology, critical care medicine, emergency medicine, and clinical pharmacology. Three independent raters participated in the validation rounds. Panelists voted on a total of 144 items in the first round and 137 items in the second round, with response rates of 96.3% and 98.3%, respectively. Twenty case reports were evaluated at each validation round and the independent raters' response rate was 99.6% and 98.8% per validation round. The final checklist consists of 114 items considered essential for case study reporting. This methodology of alternate voting and external validation rounds was useful in developing the first reporting guideline for case studies in the field of extracorporeal treatments in poisoning. We believe that this guideline will improve the completeness and transparency of published case reports and that the systematic aggregation of information from case reports may provide early signals of effectiveness and/or harm, thereby improving healthcare decision-making.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicDelphi TechniqueHumansPoisoningRenal Dialysis

Identifiers

PMID24890576
PMCPMC4282789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.