Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24890014›Full record

SynthesisBMJ supportive & palliative care2016

Controlled rehabilitative and supportive care intervention trials in patients with high-grade gliomas and their caregivers: a systematic review.

K Piil, M Juhler, J Jakobsen, M Jarden

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Coping with primary brain tumors together: a scoping review of dyadic psychosocial interventions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K PiilDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark The University Hospitals Center for Health Research (UCSF), Center for Integrated Rehabilitation for Patients with Cancer (CIRE), Copenhagen, Denmark.
M JuhlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine, Section of Neurology, Psychiatry and Sensory Sciences, The University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
J JakobsenThe University Hospital of Copenhagen; Rigshospitalet, Neuroscience Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
M JardenThe University Hospitals Center for Health Research (UCSF), Center for Integrated Rehabilitation for Patients with Cancer (CIRE), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rigshospitalet · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients diagnosed with high-grade gliomas experience a varying and complex symptom burden, and face a high mortality rate. As a consequence, patients with high-grade gliomas and their caregivers have imminent and changing rehabilitative and supportive care needs.

objectivesTo give a detailed overview of non-pharmacological rehabilitative and supportive care interventions for patients with high-grade gliomas and/or their caregivers, and provide an appraisal of the methodological quality of these studies.

methodPubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Embase were searched for literature published from 1995 to May 2013. Data from eight studies were reviewed for substantive methods and results. Methodological quality was described and assessed using the scoring system for appraising mixed methods research and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed study reviews.

resultsThe search yielded 914 unique publications, of which 9 were classified eligible for this review. There is preliminary evidence that cognitive group therapy improves memory skills in patients with high-grade gliomas, early physical training improves functional outcome and massage therapy reduces stress. Patients and caregivers found that telephone follow-up and a specialist nurse function was an effective and useful way to achieve information and support. Finally, psycho-education increased feelings of mastery among caregivers.

conclusionsAs evidence is beginning to emerge, there is a need for well-designed longitudinal and randomised controlled trials of non-pharmacological interventions in high-grade glioma patients and their caregivers in order to develop clinical guidelines for supportive and rehabilitative approaches in this unique population.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyControlled Clinical Trials as TopicPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsCaregiversFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocial SupportTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24890014
PMCPMC4789693
OpenAlexW2171547821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.