Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24889996›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2014

The impact of CT radiation dose reduction and iterative reconstruction algorithms from four different vendors on coronary calcium scoring.

Martin J Willemink, Richard A P Takx, Pim A de Jong, Ricardo P J Budde, Ronald L A W Bleys, Marco Das, Joachim E Wildberger, Mathias Prokop, Nico Buls, Johan de Mey and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A manifesto for cardiovascular imaging: addressing the human factor.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2017
    Review
  13. The role of advanced reconstruction algorithms in cardiac CT.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The effect of iterative model reconstruction on coronary artery calcium quantification.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2016
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin J WilleminkDepartment of Radiology, Utrecht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 85500, E01.132, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands, m.willemink@umcutrecht.nl.
Richard A P Takx
Pim A de Jong
Ricardo P J Budde
Ronald L A W Bleys
Marco Das
Joachim E Wildberger
Mathias Prokop
Nico Buls
Johan de Mey
Arnold M R Schilham
Tim Leiner
University Medical Center · USUtrecht University · NLUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BEMaastricht University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyse the effects of radiation dose reduction and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms on coronary calcium scoring (CCS).

methodsFifteen ex vivo human hearts were examined in an anthropomorphic chest phantom using computed tomography (CT) systems from four vendors and examined at four dose levels using unenhanced prospectively ECG-triggered protocols. Tube voltage was 120 kV and tube current differed between protocols. CT data were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and reduced dose CT data with IR. CCS was quantified with Agatston scores, calcification mass and calcification volume. Differences were analysed with the Friedman test.

resultsFourteen hearts showed coronary calcifications. Dose reduction with FBP did not significantly change Agatston scores, calcification volumes and calcification masses (P > 0.05). Maximum differences in Agatston scores were 76, 26, 51 and 161 units, in calcification volume 97, 27, 42 and 162 mm(3), and in calcification mass 23, 23, 20 and 48 mg, respectively. IR resulted in a trend towards lower Agatston scores and calcification volumes with significant differences for one vendor (P < 0.05). Median relative differences between reference FBP and reduced dose IR for Agatston scores remained within 2.0-4.6%, 1.0-5.3%, 1.2-7.7% and 2.6-4.5%, for calcification volumes within 2.4-3.9%, 1.0-5.6%, 1.1-6.4% and 3.7-4.7%, for calcification masses within 1.9-4.1%, 0.9-7.8%, 2.9-4.7% and 2.5-3.9%, respectively. IR resulted in increased, decreased or similar calcification masses.

conclusionsCCS derived from standard FBP acquisitions was not affected by radiation dose reductions up to 80%. IR resulted in a trend towards lower Agatston scores and calcification volumes. KEY POINTS: In this ex vivo study, radiation dose could be reduced by 80% for coronary calcium scoring. Iterative reconstruction resulted in a trend towards lower Agatston scores and calcification volumes. Caution should be taken for coronary calcium scoring with iterative reconstruction.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCadaverCalcinosisCalciumCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedCalcium

Identifiers

PMID24889996
OpenAlexW2091512301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.