ArticleEuropean radiology2014
The impact of CT radiation dose reduction and iterative reconstruction algorithms from four different vendors on coronary calcium scoring.
Article in European radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility analysis of non-electrocardiogram-triggered chest low-dose computed tomography using a kV-independent reconstruction algorithm for predicting cardiovascular disease risk in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Quantitative analysis of small coronary artery calcium detectability with an accurate simulation and validation on a clinical CT scanner.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Radiation Dose Reduction for Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using a Virtual Noniodine Algorithm on Photon-Counting Detector Computed-Tomography Phantom Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Improved coronary calcium detection and quantification with low-dose full field-of-view photon-counting CT: a phantom study.European radiology · 2022Article
- Optimizing iterative reconstruction for quantification of calcium hydroxyapatite with photon counting flat-detector computed tomography: a cardiac phantom study.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- Effect of different reconstruction algorithms on coronary artery calcium scores using the reduced radiation dose protocol: a clinical and phantom study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Technical Note: kV-independent coronary calcium scoring: A phantom evaluation of score accuracy and potential radiation dose reduction.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Technical development in cardiac CT: current standards and future improvements-a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Review
- Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction Negatively Impacts the Risk Category Based on Agatston Score: A Study Combining Coronary Calcium Score Measurement and Coronary CT Angiography.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Using radiation safely in cardiology: what imagers need to know.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2019Article
- Accuracy of coronary artery calcium scoring with tube current reduction by 75%, using an adaptive iterative reconstruction algorithm.The British journal of radiology · 2018Article
- A manifesto for cardiovascular imaging: addressing the human factor.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2017Review
- The role of advanced reconstruction algorithms in cardiac CT.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2017Review
- Influence of dose reduction and iterative reconstruction on CT calcium scores: a multi-manufacturer dynamic phantom study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2017Article
- In vitro evaluation of a new iterative reconstruction algorithm for dose reduction in coronary artery calcium scoring.Acta radiologica open · 2017Article
- Impact of Reconstruction Algorithms and Gender-Associated Anatomy on Coronary Calcium Scoring with CT: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study.Academic radiology · 2016Article
- Iterative reconstruction can permit the use of lower X-ray tube current in CT coronary artery calcium scoring.The British journal of radiology · 2016Article
- The effect of iterative model reconstruction on coronary artery calcium quantification.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2016Article
- Low Radiation Dose Calcium Scoring: Evidence and Techniques.Current cardiovascular imaging reportsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo analyse the effects of radiation dose reduction and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms on coronary calcium scoring (CCS).
methodsFifteen ex vivo human hearts were examined in an anthropomorphic chest phantom using computed tomography (CT) systems from four vendors and examined at four dose levels using unenhanced prospectively ECG-triggered protocols. Tube voltage was 120 kV and tube current differed between protocols. CT data were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and reduced dose CT data with IR. CCS was quantified with Agatston scores, calcification mass and calcification volume. Differences were analysed with the Friedman test.
resultsFourteen hearts showed coronary calcifications. Dose reduction with FBP did not significantly change Agatston scores, calcification volumes and calcification masses (P > 0.05). Maximum differences in Agatston scores were 76, 26, 51 and 161 units, in calcification volume 97, 27, 42 and 162 mm(3), and in calcification mass 23, 23, 20 and 48 mg, respectively. IR resulted in a trend towards lower Agatston scores and calcification volumes with significant differences for one vendor (P < 0.05). Median relative differences between reference FBP and reduced dose IR for Agatston scores remained within 2.0-4.6%, 1.0-5.3%, 1.2-7.7% and 2.6-4.5%, for calcification volumes within 2.4-3.9%, 1.0-5.6%, 1.1-6.4% and 3.7-4.7%, for calcification masses within 1.9-4.1%, 0.9-7.8%, 2.9-4.7% and 2.5-3.9%, respectively. IR resulted in increased, decreased or similar calcification masses.
conclusionsCCS derived from standard FBP acquisitions was not affected by radiation dose reductions up to 80%. IR resulted in a trend towards lower Agatston scores and calcification volumes. KEY POINTS: In this ex vivo study, radiation dose could be reduced by 80% for coronary calcium scoring. Iterative reconstruction resulted in a trend towards lower Agatston scores and calcification volumes. Caution should be taken for coronary calcium scoring with iterative reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.