Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24889617›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Contact inhibition and high cell density deactivate the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, thus suppressing the senescence program.

Olga V Leontieva, Zoya N Demidenko, Mikhail V Blagosklonny

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Partial Depletion of SART1 Selectively Induces Mitotic Defects and Cell Death in Cancer Cells.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olga V LeontievaDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263.
Zoya N DemidenkoDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263.
Mikhail V BlagosklonnyDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263 blagosklonny@oncotarget.com.
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During cell cycle arrest caused by contact inhibition (CI), cells do not undergo senescence, thus resuming proliferation after replating. The mechanism of senescence avoidance during CI is unknown. Recently, it was demonstrated that the senescence program, namely conversion from cell cycle arrest to senescence (i.e., geroconversion), requires mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Geroconversion can be suppressed by serum starvation, rapamycin, and hypoxia, which all inhibit mTOR. Here we demonstrate that CI, as evidenced by p27 induction in normal cells, was associated with inhibition of the mTOR pathway. Furthermore, CI antagonized senescence caused by CDK inhibitors. Stimulation of mTOR in contact-inhibited cells favored senescence. In cancer cells lacking p27 induction and CI, mTOR was still inhibited in confluent culture as a result of conditioning of the medium. This inhibition of mTOR suppressed p21-induced senescence. Also, trapping of malignant cells among contact-inhibited normal cells antagonized p21-induced senescence. Thus, we identified two nonmutually exclusive mechanisms of mTOR inhibition in high cell density: (i) CI associated with p27 induction in normal cells and (ii) conditioning of the medium, especially in cancer cells. Both mechanisms can coincide in various proportions in various cells. Our work explains why CI is reversible and, most importantly, why cells avoid senescence in vivo, given that cells are contact-inhibited in the organism.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceContact Inhibitionbeta-GalactosidaseCell CycleCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCulture Media, ConditionedCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27FibrosarcomaFlow CytometryHumansNeoplasmsRetinal Pigment EpitheliumSignal Transductionbeta-GalactosidaseCDKN1A protein, humanCDKN1B protein, humanCulture Media, ConditionedCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27MTOR protein, humanTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID24889617
PMCPMC4066505
OpenAlexW2071251338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.