Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24889616›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Metabolomics and proteomics reveal impacts of chemically mediated competition on marine plankton.

Kelsey L Poulson-Ellestad, Christina M Jones, Jessie Roy, Mark R Viant, Facundo M Fernández, Julia Kubanek, Brook L Nunn

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Quantitative Proteomic Profiling of Marine DiatomFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kelsey L Poulson-EllestadSchool of Biology, Aquatic Chemical Ecology Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332;Institute of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332;
Christina M JonesSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332;
Jessie RoySchool of Biology, Aquatic Chemical Ecology Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332;Institute of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332;
Mark R ViantSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; and.
Facundo M FernándezInstitute of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332;School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332;
Julia KubanekSchool of Biology, Aquatic Chemical Ecology Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332;Institute of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332;School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332; brookh@uw.edu julia.kubanek@biology.gatech.edu.
Brook L NunnDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 brookh@uw.edu julia.kubanek@biology.gatech.edu.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competition is a major force structuring marine planktonic communities. The release of compounds that inhibit competitors, a process known as allelopathy, may play a role in the maintenance of large blooms of the red-tide dinoflagellate Karenia brevis, which produces potent neurotoxins that negatively impact coastal marine ecosystems. K. brevis is variably allelopathic to multiple competitors, typically causing sublethal suppression of growth. We used metabolomic and proteomic analyses to investigate the role of chemically mediated ecological interactions between K. brevis and two diatom competitors, Asterionellopsis glacialis and Thalassiosira pseudonana. The impact of K. brevis allelopathy on competitor physiology was reflected in the metabolomes and expressed proteomes of both diatoms, although the diatom that co-occurs with K. brevis blooms (A. glacialis) exhibited more robust metabolism in response to K. brevis. The observed partial resistance of A. glacialis to allelopathy may be a result of its frequent exposure to K. brevis blooms in the Gulf of Mexico. For the more sensitive diatom, T. pseudonana, which may not have had opportunity to evolve resistance to K. brevis, allelopathy disrupted energy metabolism and impeded cellular protection mechanisms including altered cell membrane components, inhibited osmoregulation, and increased oxidative stress. Allelopathic compounds appear to target multiple physiological pathways in sensitive competitors, demonstrating that chemical cues in the plankton have the potential to alter large-scale ecosystem processes including primary production and nutrient cycling.

Indexed as

MetabolomeProteomeCell MembraneDiatomsDinoflagellidaEcologyEcosystemFoodHarmful Algal BloomMarine ToxinsMass SpectrometryOsmoregulationOxidative StressPhotosynthesisPhytoplanktonPlanktonMarine ToxinsProteomechemical ecologymass spectrometrysystems biology

Identifiers

PMID24889616
PMCPMC4066504
OpenAlexW2073822589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.