Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24889608›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Multiplex genome editing by natural transformation.

Ankur B Dalia, EmilyKate McDonough, Andrew Camilli

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 251 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A biofilm-derived peptide as an underwater adhesive.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Structural modeling reveals the mechanism of motor ATPase coordination during type IV pilus retraction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ThemBio · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. DNA repair is essential forJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Article
  18. DprA recruits ComM to facilitate recombination during natural transformation in Gram-negative bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ankur B DaliaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology and.
EmilyKate McDonoughDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology and.
Andrew CamilliDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology andHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111 andrew.camilli@tufts.edu.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Study of transmissible forms of Vibrio CholeraeR01AI055058 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI CAMILLI, ANDREW · 2003 to 2019
$5.8M
STUDY OF VIBRIO INTESTINAL PHYSIOLOGY AND PATHOGENICITYR01AI045746 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI CAMILLI, ANDREW · 2000 to 2016
$5.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAID NIH HHS AI045746NIAID NIH HHS AI055058NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI045746NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI055058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Editing bacterial genomes is an essential tool in research and synthetic biology applications. Here, we describe multiplex genome editing by natural transformation (MuGENT), a method for accelerated evolution based on the cotransformation of unlinked genetic markers in naturally competent microorganisms. We found that natural cotransformation allows scarless genome editing at unprecedented frequencies of ∼50%. Using DNA substrates with randomized nucleotides, we found no evidence for bias during natural cotransformation, indicating that this method can be used for directed evolution studies. Furthermore, we found that natural cotransformation is an effective method for multiplex genome editing. Because MuGENT does not require selection at edited loci in cis, output mutant pools are highly complex, and strains may have any number and combination of the multiplexed genome edits. We demonstrate the utility of this technique in metabolic and phenotypic engineering by optimizing natural transformation in Vibrio cholerae. This was accomplished by combinatorially editing the genome via gene deletions and promoter replacements and by tuning translation initiation of five genes involved in the process of natural competence and transformation. MuGENT allowed for the generation of a complex mutant pool in 1 wk and resulted in the selection of a genetically edited strain with a 30-fold improvement in natural transformation. We also demonstrate the efficacy of this technique in Streptococcus pneumoniae and highlight the potential for MuGENT to be used in multiplex genetic interaction analysis. Thus, MuGENT is a broadly applicable platform for accelerated evolution and genetic interaction studies in diverse naturally competent species.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesGenome, BacterialTransformation, BacterialComputational BiologyDNAEscherichia coliGenetic EngineeringMutationPhenotypePolymerase Chain ReactionRecombination, GeneticStreptococcus pneumoniaeVibrio choleraeDNA

Identifiers

PMID24889608
PMCPMC4066482
OpenAlexW2058989497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.