Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24889505›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2015

Efficacy and safety of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 23 studies.

Qian Feng, Yugang Chi, Yanqian Liu, Ling Zhang, Qi Liu

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. [Guidelines for image-guided ablation of primary liver cancer (2023 version)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for palliative treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qian FengThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Disease, Chinese Ministry of Education, Institute for Viral Hepatitis, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, 74 Lin Jiang Road, Chongqing, 400010, China.
Yugang Chi
Yanqian Liu
Ling Zhang
Qi Liu
Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of our meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus surgical resection for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (SHCC).

methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) or retrospective studies comparing the RFA with surgical resection for patients with SHCC published from 2004 to 2014 were selected from database of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library. The outcomes including overall survival rate, recurrence-free survival rate, recurrence rate and complications (mortality rate and morbidity rate) were abstracted. Individual and pooled odds ratio with 95% confidence interval of each outcome was analyzed.

resultsThree RCTs and twenty retrospective studies were included with a total of 15,482 patients. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rate and recurrence-free survival rate of surgical resection were significantly higher than RFA. The 2- and 3-year but not 1-year recurrence rate of RFA was significantly higher than surgical resection. The morbidity rate of complication in surgical resection group was higher than it in RFA group, but the mortality was not different between the two groups.

conclusionSurgical resection led to a higher overall survival and recurrence-free survival rate in treating SHCC. However, RFA led to a lower morbidity rate of complication than surgical resection.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationHepatectomyCarcinoma, HepatocellularHumansLiver NeoplasmsSafetyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24889505
PMCPMC11823996
OpenAlexW2130252078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.