Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24889436›Full record

GuidelineChest2014

An official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians policy statement: the Choosing Wisely top five list in adult pulmonary medicine.

Renda Soylemez Wiener, Daniel R Ouellette, Edward Diamond, Vincent S Fan, Janet R Maurer, Richard A Mularski, Jay I Peters, Scott D Halpern

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus StatementPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Chest, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Short-Term Oxygen Therapy Outcomes in COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Choosing Wisely recommendations in oncology: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Evaluation of CTPA Ordering for Pulmonary Embolisms by Patient Race and Ethnicity.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sex differences in guideline-consistent diagnostic testing for acute pulmonary embolism among adult emergency department patients aged 18-49.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Renda Soylemez WienerPulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH. Electronic address: rwiener@bu.edu.
Daniel R OuellettePulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI.
Edward DiamondSuburban Lung Associates, Elk Grove Village, IL.
Vincent S FanHealth Services Research and Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Janet R MaurerDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Quality Improvement and Compliance, National Imaging Associates/Magellan Health Services, Inc, Phoenix, AZ.
Richard A MularskiThe Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR; Department of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, Northwest Permanente PC, Portland, OR; Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Jay I PetersUT Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX.
Scott D HalpernDepartments of Medicine, Biostatistics and Epidemiology, and Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and the Leonard Davis Institute Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital · USHenry Ford Health System · USKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USMagellan Health · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

Improving decisions about evaluating pulmonary nodules for lung cancerK07CA138772 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI WIENER, RENDA SOYLEMEZ · 2009 to 2013
$860k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA138772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation's Choosing Wisely campaign aims to curb health-care costs and improve patient care by soliciting lists from medical societies of the top five tests or treatments in their specialty that are used too frequently and inappropriately. The American Thoracic Society (ATS) and American College of Chest Physicians created a joint task force, which produced a top five list for adult pulmonary medicine. Our top five recommendations, which were approved by the executive committees of the ATS and American College of Chest Physicians and published by Choosing Wisely in October 2013, are as follows: (1) Do not perform CT scan surveillance for evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules at more frequent intervals or for a longer period of time than recommended by established guidelines; (2) do not routinely offer pharmacologic treatment with advanced vasoactive agents approved only for the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension to patients with pulmonary hypertension resulting from left heart disease or hypoxemic lung diseases (groups II or III pulmonary hypertension); (3) for patients recently discharged on supplemental home oxygen following hospitalization for an acute illness, do not renew the prescription without assessing the patient for ongoing hypoxemia; (4) do not perform chest CT angiography to evaluate for possible pulmonary embolism in patients with a low clinical probability and negative results of a highly sensitive D-dimer assay; (5) do not perform CT scan screening for lung cancer among patients at low risk for lung cancer. We hope pulmonologists will use these recommendations to stimulate frank discussions with patients about when these tests and treatments are indicated--and when they are not.

Indexed as

AngiographyDiagnostic Techniques, Respiratory SystemEarly Detection of CancerHealth Care CostsHumansHypertension, PulmonaryLung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesOxygen Inhalation TherapyPatient CarePulmonary EmbolismPulmonary MedicineTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnited StatesVasoconstrictor AgentsVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID24889436
PMCPMC4694177
OpenAlexW2132135180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.