Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24889111›Full record

ArticleNature communications2014

Monitoring the dynamics of clonal tumour evolution in vivo using secreted luciferases.

Joël P Charles, Jeannette Fuchs, Mirjam Hefter, Jonas B Vischedyk, Maximilian Kleint, Fotini Vogiatzi, Jonas A Schäfer, Andrea Nist, Oleg Timofeev, Michael Wanzel and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mutant p53 promotes tumor progression and metastasis by the endoplasmic reticulum UDPase ENTPD5.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joël P Charles1] Molecular Oncology, Philipps-University, 35043 Marburg, Germany [2].
Jeannette Fuchs1] Molecular Oncology, Philipps-University, 35043 Marburg, Germany [2].
Mirjam HefterMolecular Oncology, Philipps-University, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Jonas B VischedykMolecular Oncology, Philipps-University, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Maximilian KleintMolecular Oncology, Philipps-University, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Fotini VogiatziMolecular Oncology, Philipps-University, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Jonas A SchäferMolecular Oncology, Philipps-University, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Andrea NistMolecular Oncology, Philipps-University, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Oleg TimofeevMolecular Oncology, Philipps-University, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Michael WanzelMolecular Oncology, Philipps-University, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Thorsten StieweMolecular Oncology, Philipps-University, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumours are heterogeneous cell populations that undergo clonal evolution during tumour progression, metastasis and response to therapy. Short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) generate stable loss-of-function phenotypes and are versatile experimental tools to explore the contribution of individual genetic alterations to clonal evolution. In these experiments tumour cells carrying shRNAs are commonly tracked with fluorescent reporters. While this works well for cell culture studies and leukaemia mouse models, fluorescent reporters are poorly suited for animals with solid tumours--the most common tumour types in cancer patients. Here we develop a toolkit that uses secreted luciferases to track the fate of two different shRNA-expressing tumour cell clones competitively, both in vitro and in vivo. We demonstrate that secreted luciferase activities can be measured robustly in the blood stream of tumour-bearing mice to accurately quantify, in a minimally invasive manner, the dynamic evolution of two genetically distinct tumour subclones in preclinical mouse models of tumour development, metastasis and therapy.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsLuciferasesAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationClonal EvolutionHCT116 CellsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceNeoplasmsRNA, Small InterferingLuciferasesRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID24889111
PMCPMC4059931
OpenAlexW2065635890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.