Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24888714›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physical anthropology2014

Canalization and developmental instability of the fetal skull in a mouse model of maternal nutritional stress.

Paula N Gonzalez, Federico P Lotto, Benedikt Hallgrímsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physical anthropology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The developmental-genetics of canalization.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A century of development.American journal of physical anthropology · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The heritability of chimpanzee and human brain asymmetry.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dermatoglyphics in hypertension: a review.Journal of physiological anthropology · 2015
    Review
  14. Morphometrics, 3D Imaging, and Craniofacial Development.Current topics in developmental biology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paula N GonzalezCONICET, Instituto de Genética Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, UNLP-CCT La Plata, 1900, Argentina; CONICET, División Antropología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
Federico P Lotto
Benedikt Hallgrímsson

Funding

The role of continuous phenotypic variation in structural defects of the faceR01DE019638 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Benedikt Hallgrimsson, Ralph S Marcucio · 2010 to 2026
$7.3M
Developmental mechanisms underlying genotype-phenotype correlationsR01DE021708 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HALLGRIMSSON, BENEDIKT, MARCUCIO, RALPH S · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
CIHRNIDCR NIH HHS 1R01DE01963NIDCR NIH HHS 1R01DE021708NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE019638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutritional imbalance is one of the main sources of stress in both extant and extinct human populations. Restricted availability of nutrients is thought to disrupt the buffering mechanisms that contribute to developmental stability and canalization, resulting in increased levels of fluctuating asymmetry (FA) and phenotypic variance among individuals. However, the literature is contradictory in this regard. This study assesses the effect of prenatal nutritional stress on FA and among-individual variance in cranial shape and size using a mouse model of maternal protein restriction. Two sets of landmark coordinates were digitized in three dimensions from skulls of control and protein restricted specimens at E17.5 and E18.5. We found that, by the end of gestation, maternal protein restriction resulted in a significant reduction of skull size. Fluctuating asymmetry in size and shape exceeded the amount of measurement error in all groups, but no significant differences in the magnitude of FA were found between treatments. Conversely, the pattern of shape asymmetry was affected by the environmental perturbation since the angles between the first eigenvectors extracted from the covariance matrix of shape asymmetric component of protein restricted and control groups were not significantly different from the expected for random vectors. In addition, among-individual variance in cranial shape was significantly higher in the protein restricted than the control group at E18.5. Overall, the results obtained from a controlled experiment do not support the view of fluctuating asymmetry of cranial structures as a reliable index for inferring nutritional stress in human populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFetal Nutrition DisordersFetusMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOrgan SizePhenotypeSkullfetal growthfluctuating asymmetryphenotypic variationprotein restriction

Identifiers

PMID24888714
PMCPMC4425270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.