ArticleAmerican journal of physical anthropology2014
Canalization and developmental instability of the fetal skull in a mouse model of maternal nutritional stress.
Article in American journal of physical anthropology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations Between Developmental Stability, Canalization, and Phenotypic Plasticity in Response to Heterogeneous Experience.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Early Life Stress (ELS) Effects on Fetal and Adult Bone Development.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Canalization and developmental stability of the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis) mandible and cranium related to age and nematode parasitism.Frontiers in zoology · 2021Article
- A model of developmental canalization, applied to human cranial form.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- The developmental-genetics of canalization.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2019Review
- Mouse Skull Mean Shape and Shape Robustness Rely on Different Genetic Architectures and Different Loci.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Zika virus impairs the development of blood vessels in a mouse model of congenital infection.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- A century of development.American journal of physical anthropology · 2018Review
- Developmental nonlinearity drives phenotypic robustness.Nature communications · 2017Article
- The heritability of chimpanzee and human brain asymmetry.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016Article
- Chronic Protein Restriction in Mice Impacts Placental Function and Maternal Body Weight before Fetal Growth.PloS one · 2016Article
- Cranial symmetry in baleen whales (Cetacea, Mysticeti) and the occurrence of cranial asymmetry throughout cetacean evolution.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2015Article
- Dermatoglyphics in hypertension: a review.Journal of physiological anthropology · 2015Review
- Morphometrics, 3D Imaging, and Craniofacial Development.Current topics in developmental biology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nutritional imbalance is one of the main sources of stress in both extant and extinct human populations. Restricted availability of nutrients is thought to disrupt the buffering mechanisms that contribute to developmental stability and canalization, resulting in increased levels of fluctuating asymmetry (FA) and phenotypic variance among individuals. However, the literature is contradictory in this regard. This study assesses the effect of prenatal nutritional stress on FA and among-individual variance in cranial shape and size using a mouse model of maternal protein restriction. Two sets of landmark coordinates were digitized in three dimensions from skulls of control and protein restricted specimens at E17.5 and E18.5. We found that, by the end of gestation, maternal protein restriction resulted in a significant reduction of skull size. Fluctuating asymmetry in size and shape exceeded the amount of measurement error in all groups, but no significant differences in the magnitude of FA were found between treatments. Conversely, the pattern of shape asymmetry was affected by the environmental perturbation since the angles between the first eigenvectors extracted from the covariance matrix of shape asymmetric component of protein restricted and control groups were not significantly different from the expected for random vectors. In addition, among-individual variance in cranial shape was significantly higher in the protein restricted than the control group at E18.5. Overall, the results obtained from a controlled experiment do not support the view of fluctuating asymmetry of cranial structures as a reliable index for inferring nutritional stress in human populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.