Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24888605›Full record

ReviewClinical oral investigations2015

A chemiluminescent light system in combination with toluidine blue to assess suspicious oral lesions-clinical evaluation and review of the literature.

P W Kämmerer, R K Rahimi-Nedjat, T Ziebart, A Bemsch, C Walter, B Al-Nawas, F P Koch

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical oral investigations, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Oral cancer diagnostics: An overview.National journal of maxillofacial surgery
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

P W KämmererDepartment of Oral-, Maxillofacial- and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Rostock, Germany, peer.kaemmerer@gmx.de.
R K Rahimi-Nedjat
T Ziebart
A Bemsch
C Walter
B Al-Nawas
F P Koch
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEPraxis · EEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the study was an evaluation of an acetic acid wash and chemiluminescent light system in combination with toluidine blue in order to detect visual identified, potentially malignant lesions. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-four patients with 50 oral lesions of primary uncertain visible dignity were included. Next to a clinical examination, a screening with ViziLite® (VL) as well as toluidine blue (TB; together ViziLite® Plus (VLP)) was conducted. Histopathology served as gold standard and sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive as well as negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) was calculated descriptively. Additionally, a PubMed literature search using the key words "ViziLite" and "chemiluminescence oral cancer" was conducted.

resultsHistological diagnosis showed 40 lesions of reactive/inflammatory nature, moderate dysplasia (n = 3) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC n = 7). All OSCCs and one dysplasia were identified correct via clinical diagnosis (SE 90 %, SP 100 %, PPV 100 %, NPV 97.5 %). VL examination could show all malignancies with low specificity (SE 100 %, SP 30 %, PPV 26 %, NPV 100 %). TB and VLP were positive in all cases of cancer and in one case of inflammation (SE 80 %, SP 97.5 %, PPV 89 %, NPV 95 %). In the review, eight clinical trials with similar results were included.

conclusionsThe adjunct of TB to VL reduces the number of false positives without increasing the rate of false negatives. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinical evidence to justify the additional cost of the system for diagnosis of suspicious lesions is weak. However, for the potential role of VLP in detection of lesions not otherwise identified in the visual exam in general dental practice further studies are required.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansLuminescenceMaleMiddle AgedMouth DiseasesTolonium ChlorideTolonium Chloride

Identifiers

PMID24888605
OpenAlexW2095552814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.