Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24888576›Full record

SynthesisHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2015

Pancreaticogastrostomy is associated with significantly less pancreatic fistula than pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials.

Fu-Bao Liu, Jiang-Ming Chen, Wei Geng, Sheng-Xue Xie, Yi-Jun Zhao, Li-Quan Yu, Xiao-Ping Geng

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Systematic review on the use of matrix-bound sealants in pancreatic resection.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Novel Reconstruction Technique During Pancreaticoduodenectomy After Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: How I do It.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Article
  17. [Range of variation of pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreatic head resection].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  18. The influence of fellowship training on the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2016
    Article
  19. Comparison of Modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2016
    Article
  20. Defining the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy around the world.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fu-Bao LiuDepartment of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Jiang-Ming Chen
Wei Geng
Sheng-Xue Xie
Yi-Jun Zhao
Li-Quan Yu
Xiao-Ping Geng
Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CNAnhui Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to compare pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) with pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

methodsA literature search of PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies comparing PJ with PG after PD was conducted. The primary outcome for meta-analysis was pancreatic fistula. Secondary outcomes were morbidity, mortality, biliary fistula, intra-abdominal fluid collection, hospital length of stay (LoS), postoperative haemorrhage and reoperation. Outcome measures were odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsSeven recent RCTs encompassing 1121 patients (559 PJ and 562 PG cases) were involved in this meta-analysis. Incidences of pancreatic fistula (10.6% versus 18.5%; OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.37-0.74; P = 0.0002), biliary fistula (2.3% versus 5.7%; OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.03-3.15; P = 0.03) and intra-abdominal fluid collection (8.0% versus 14.7%; OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.74; P = 0.0005) were significantly lower in the PG than the PJ group, as was hospital LoS (weighted mean difference: -1.85, 95% CI -3.23 to -0.47; P = 0.008). Subgroup analysis indicated that severe pancreatic fistula (grades B or C) occurred less frequently in the PG than the PJ group (8.3% versus 20.5%; OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.23-0.59; P < 0.00001). However, there was no significant difference in morbidity (48.9% versus 51.0%; OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.70-1.16; P = 0.41), mortality (3.2% versus 3.5%; OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.43-1.58; P = 0.56), delayed gastric emptying (16.6% versus 14.7%; relative risk: 1.02, 95% CI 0.62-1.68; P = 0.94), postoperative haemorrhage (9.6% versus 11.1%; OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.54-1.24; P = 0.35) or reoperation (9.9% versus 9.8%; OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.60-1.43; P = 0.73).

conclusionsPancreaticogastrostomy provides benefits over PJ after PD, including in the incidences of pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula and intra-abdominal fluid collection and in hospital LoS. Therefore, PG is recommended as a safer and more reasonable alternative to PJ reconstruction after PD.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresGastrostomyHumansPancreatectomyPancreaticoduodenectomyPancreaticojejunostomy

Identifiers

PMID24888576
PMCPMC4299386
OpenAlexW2080321584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.