Observational studyLangenbeck's archives of surgery2014
Outcome stagnation of liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease era.
Observational study in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging-based diagnosis of sarcopenia for transplant-free survival in primary sclerosing cholangitis.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Risk Factors for Recurrence of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis after Liver Transplantation: Single-Center Data.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Liver Transplantation for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) With or Without Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)-A European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023Article
- Pharmacological interventions for primary sclerosing cholangitis: an attempted network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Review
- Biliary complications following liver transplantation: Single-center experience over three decades and recent risk factors.World journal of hepatology · 2017Article
- Liver Transplantation for Patients with Cholestatic Liver Diseases.Viszeralmedizin · 2015Review
- The MELD score predicts the short-term and overall survival after liver transplantation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis or autoimmune liver diseases.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2014Article
- Comparable outcome of liver transplantation with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate vs. University of Wisconsin preservation solution: a retrospective observational double-center trial.BMC gastroenterology · 2014Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSurvival after liver transplantation (LTX) has decreased in Germany since the implementation of Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)-based liver allocation. Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is known for its otherwise excellent outcome after LTX. The influence of MELD-based liver allocation and subsequent allocation policy alterations on the outcome of LTX for PSC is analyzed.
methodsThis is a retrospective observational study including 126 consecutive patients treated with LTX for PSC between January 1, 1999 and August 31, 2012. The PSC cohort was further compared to all other indications for LTX in the study period (n=1420) with a mean follow-up of 7.9 years (SD 3.2). Multivariate risk-adjusted analyses were performed. Alterations of allocation policy have been taken into account systematically.
resultsTransplant recipients suffering from PSC are significantly younger (p<0.001), can be discharged earlier (p=0.018), and have lower 3-month mortality than patients with other indications (p=0.044). The observed time on the waiting list is significantly longer for patients with PSC (p<0.001), and there is a trend toward lower match MELD points in the PSC cohort (p=0.052). No improvement in means of short-term mortality could be shown in relation to alterations of allocation policy within the MELD era (p=0.375). Survival rates of the pre-MELD era did not differ significantly from those of the MELD era (p=0.097) in multivariate risk-adjusted analysis. Patients in the MELD era suffered pre-transplant significantly more frequently from dominant bile duct stenosis (p=0.071, p=0.059, p=0.048, respectively; chi2).
conclusionsProgress is stagnating in LTX for PSC. Current liver allocation for PSC patients should be reconsidered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.