Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24888481›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

Comparative genomics of Bradyrhizobium japonicum CPAC 15 and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens CPAC 7: elite model strains for understanding symbiotic performance with soybean.

Arthur Fernandes Siqueira, Ernesto Ormeño-Orrillo, Rangel Celso Souza, Elisete Pains Rodrigues, Luiz Gonzaga Paula Almeida, Fernando Gomes Barcellos, Jesiane Stefânia Silva Batista, Andre Shigueyoshi Nakatani, Esperanza Martínez-Romero, Ana Tereza Ribeiro Vasconcelos and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative genomic analysis ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. NopC/T/L Signal Crosstalk GeneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. The Type IV Secretion System (T4SS) Mediates Symbiosis betweenApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Permanent draft genome sequence ofJournal of genomics · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Brief history of biofertilizers in Brazil: from conventional approaches to new biotechnological solutions.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Review
  17. Ancient Bacterial ClassInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Co-Inoculation ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Arthur Fernandes Siqueira
Ernesto Ormeño-Orrillo
Rangel Celso Souza
Elisete Pains Rodrigues
Luiz Gonzaga Paula Almeida
Fernando Gomes Barcellos
Jesiane Stefânia Silva Batista
Andre Shigueyoshi Nakatani
Esperanza Martínez-Romero
Ana Tereza Ribeiro Vasconcelos
Mariangela HungriaDepartment Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), C,P, 60001, Londrina, PR 86051-990, Brazil. mariangela.hungria@embrapa.br.
Universidade Estadual de Londrina · BRLaboratório Nacional de Computação Científica · BRUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe soybean-Bradyrhizobium symbiosis can be highly efficient in fixing nitrogen, but few genomic sequences of elite inoculant strains are available. Here we contribute with information on the genomes of two commercial strains that are broadly applied to soybean crops in the tropics. B. japonicum CPAC 15 (=SEMIA 5079) is outstanding in its saprophytic capacity and competitiveness, whereas B. diazoefficiens CPAC 7 (=SEMIA 5080) is known for its high efficiency in fixing nitrogen. Both are well adapted to tropical soils. The genomes of CPAC 15 and CPAC 7 were compared to each other and also to those of B. japonicum USDA 6T and B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T.

resultsDifferences in genome size were found between species, with B. japonicum having larger genomes than B. diazoefficiens. Although most of the four genomes were syntenic, genome rearrangements within and between species were observed, including events in the symbiosis island. In addition to the symbiotic region, several genomic islands were identified. Altogether, these features must confer high genomic plasticity that might explain adaptation and differences in symbiotic performance. It was not possible to attribute known functions to half of the predicted genes. About 10% of the genomes was composed of exclusive genes of each strain, but up to 98% of them were of unknown function or coded for mobile genetic elements. In CPAC 15, more genes were associated with secondary metabolites, nutrient transport, iron-acquisition and IAA metabolism, potentially correlated with higher saprophytic capacity and competitiveness than seen with CPAC 7. In CPAC 7, more genes were related to the metabolism of amino acids and hydrogen uptake, potentially correlated with higher efficiency of nitrogen fixation than seen with CPAC 15.

conclusionsSeveral differences and similarities detected between the two elite soybean-inoculant strains and between the two species of Bradyrhizobium provide new insights into adaptation to tropical soils, efficiency of N2 fixation, nodulation and competitiveness.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialBradyrhizobiumGenome SizeGenomicsGlycine maxInterspersed Repetitive SequencesMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRecombination, GeneticSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID24888481
PMCPMC4070871
OpenAlexW2110399969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.