ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2014
A 'ramp-sprint' protocol to characterise indices of aerobic function and exercise intensity domains in a single laboratory test.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The 3-min all-out test in cycling: a systematic review and meta-analysis on its reliability and validity.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Trying to disentangle the causes of dyspnea and exercise limitation in a subject with GATA2 deficiency and normal spirometry: a case report.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Durability of the Major Determinants of Endurance Performance Is Not Different After 15 kJ·kgEuropean journal of sport science · 2025Article
- Physiological Correspondence Between Different Indexes of High-Intensity Endurance Exercise in Young Male Runners.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Utility of the Respiratory Compensation Point for Estimating Critical Power: Insights From Normoxia and Hypoxia.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
- Repeatability and Validity of Different Methods to Determine the Anaerobic Threshold Through the Maximal Multistage Test in Male Cyclists and Triathletes.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024Article
- Bi-exponential modelling ofEuropean journal of applied physiology · 2022Article
- The ramp and all-out exercise test to determine critical power: validity and robustness to manipulations in body position.European journal of applied physiology · 2021Article
- Physiological and anthropometric determinants of critical power, W' and the reconstitution of W' in trained and untrained male cyclists.European journal of applied physiology · 2020Article
- The Application of Critical Power, the Work Capacity above Critical Power (W'), and its Reconstitution: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Implications for Cycling Training Prescription.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- The maximal metabolic steady state: redefining the 'gold standard'.Physiological reports · 2019Review
- The Critical Power Model as a Potential Tool for Anti-doping.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe lactate threshold (LT), critical power (CP) and maximum oxygen uptake (VO₂max) together partition exercise intensity domains by their common physiological, biochemical and perceptual response characteristics. CP is the greatest power output attainable immediately following intolerance at VO₂peak, and the asymptote of 3 min all-out exercise. Thus we reasoned that a maximal 'sprint' immediately following standard ramp-incremental exercise would allow characterisation of the three aerobic indices in a single test.
methodsTen healthy men (23 ± 3 year, mean ± SD) performed 9 cycle-ergometry tests on different days: (A) two ramp-incremental tests to intolerance (20 W min(-1)), immediately followed by a 3 min maximal, variable-power effort ramp-sprint test (RST) for LT, VO₂peak and sprint-phase power (SP) determination; (B) four constant-power tests for CP and VO₂max determination; (C) constant-power tests at 10 W below LT, and 10 W below and above SP to verify intensity domain characterisation. Capillary [lactate] and breath-by-breath VO₂ were measured.
resultsReproducibility of LT, SP and VO₂max measurements between RST repeats was within 5% or less (r ≥ 0.991, p < 0.001). CP (257 ± 46 W) was not different (p = 0.72) from SP (258 ± 42 W). Exercise 10 W below LT and SP resulted in steady state VO₂ and [lactate]. VO₂max (4.0 ± 0.6 L min(-1)), peak [lactate] (11 ± 2 mM) and intolerance were reached 19 ± 5 min into exercise at 10 W above SP.
conclusionsThese data suggest that the key indices of aerobic function may be accurately and reliably estimated during a single exercise test. This test may provide a basis for simplifying assessment and prescription of exercise training and experimental interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24888425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.