Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24887609›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society2014

Efficient and reliable characterization of the corticospinal system using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Sahana N Kukke, Rainer W Paine, Chi-Chao Chao, Ana C de Campos, Mark Hallett

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sahana N Kukke*Human Motor Control Section, Medical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.; †Functional and Applied Biomechanics Lab, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.; ‡Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Rainer W Paine
Chi-Chao Chao
Ana C de Campos
Mark Hallett

Funding

Physiology of Voluntary MovementZIANS002669 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI HALLETT, MARK · 2009 to 2023
$15.4M
Physiology of Voluntary MovementZ01NS002669 · NINDS · NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI HALLETT, MARK A · 1985 to 2008
$2.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 NS002669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to develop a method to reliably characterize multiple features of the corticospinal system in a more efficient manner than typically done in transcranial magnetic stimulation studies.

methodsForty transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses of varying intensity were given over the first dorsal interosseous motor hot spot in 10 healthy adults. The first dorsal interosseous motor-evoked potential size was recorded during rest and activation to create recruitment curves. The Boltzmann sigmoidal function was fit to the data, and parameters relating to maximal motor-evoked potential size, curve slope, and stimulus intensity leading to half-maximal motor-evoked potential size were computed from the curve fit.

resultsGood to excellent test-retest reliability was found for all corticospinal parameters at rest and during activation with 40 transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses.

conclusionsThrough the use of curve fitting, important features of the corticospinal system can be determined with fewer stimuli than typically used for the same information. Determining the recruitment curve provides a basis to understand the state of the corticospinal system and select subject-specific parameters for transcranial magnetic stimulation testing quickly and without unnecessary exposure to magnetic stimulation. This method can be useful in individuals who have difficulty in maintaining stillness, including children and patients with motor disorders.

Indexed as

AdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMuscle ContractionPyramidal TractsReproducibility of ResultsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24887609
PMCPMC4744647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.