Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24887586›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The effect of health-facility admission and skilled birth attendant coverage on maternal survival in India: a case-control analysis.

Ann L Montgomery, Shaza Fadel, Rajesh Kumar, Sue Bondy, Rahim Moineddin, Prabhat Jha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ann L MontgomeryCentre for Global Health Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Shaza FadelCentre for Global Health Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Rajesh KumarSchool of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education, Chandigarh, India.
Sue BondyDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.
Rahim MoineddinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; The Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
Prabhat JhaCentre for Global Health Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.
Centre for Global Health Research · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INSt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch in areas of low skilled attendant coverage found that maternal mortality is paradoxically higher in women who seek obstetric care. We estimated the effect of health-facility admission on maternal survival, and how this effect varies with skilled attendant coverage across India. METHODS/

findingsUsing unmatched population-based case-control analysis of national datasets, we compared the effect of health-facility admission at any time (antenatal, intrapartum, postpartum) on maternal deaths (cases) to women reporting pregnancies (controls). Probability of maternal death decreased with increasing skilled attendant coverage, among both women who were and were not admitted to a health-facility, however, the risk of death among women who were admitted was higher (at 50% coverage, OR = 2.32, 95% confidence interval 1.85-2.92) than among those women who were not; while at higher levels of coverage, the effect of health-facility admission was attenuated. In a secondary analysis, the probability of maternal death decreased with increasing coverage among both women admitted for delivery or delivered at home but there was no effect of admission for delivery on mortality risk (50% coverage, OR = 1.0, 0.80-1.25), suggesting that poor quality of obstetric care may have attenuated the benefits of facility-based care. Subpopulation analysis of obstetric hemorrhage cases and report of 'excessive bleeding' in controls showed that the probability of maternal death decreased with increasing skilled attendant coverage; but the effect of health-facility admission was attenuated (at 50% coverage, OR = 1.47, 0.95-1.79), suggesting that some of the effect in the main model can be explained by women arriving at facility with complications underway. Finally, highest risk associated with health-facility admission was clustered in women with education ≤ 8 years.

conclusionsThe effect of health-facility admission did vary by skilled attendant coverage, and this effect appears to be driven partially by reverse causality; however, inequitable access to and possibly poor quality of healthcare for primary and emergency services appears to play a role in maternal survival as well.

Indexed as

Maternal MortalityAdolescentAdultClinical CompetenceFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansIndiaMaternal Health ServicesMiddle AgedMidwiferyModels, TheoreticalOdds RatioPatient AdmissionPregnancyProbability

Identifiers

PMID24887586
PMCPMC4041636
OpenAlexW1977823922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.