Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24887420›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Preclinical therapeutic potential of a nitrosylating agent in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Shailendra Giri, Ramandeep Rattan, Mandar Deshpande, Jacie L Maguire, Zachary Johnson, Rondell P Graham, Viji Shridhar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The Triple Crown: NO, CO, and HPharmacology & therapeutics · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. S-Nitrosylation in Tumor Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. S-nitrosothiols and HRedox biology · 2019
    Review
  11. S-Nitrosylation: An Emerging Paradigm of Redox Signaling.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shailendra GiriDepartment of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Ramandeep RattanWomen's Health Services, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.
Mandar DeshpandeDepartment of Neurology, Henry Ford Health system, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.
Jacie L MaguireDepartment of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Zachary JohnsonDepartment of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Rondell P GrahamDepartment of Anatomic/Clinical Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Viji ShridharDepartment of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Mayo Clinic · USMichigan United · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the role of s-nitrosylation in the growth of ovarian cancer using cell culture based and in vivo approaches. Using the nitrosylating agent, S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), a physiological nitric oxide molecule, we show that GSNO treatment inhibited proliferation of chemoresponsive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer cell lines (A2780, C200, SKVO3, ID8, OVCAR3, OVCAR4, OVCAR5, OVCAR7, OVCAR8, OVCAR10, PE01 and PE04) in a dose dependent manner. GSNO treatment abrogated growth factor (HB-EGF) induced signal transduction including phosphorylation of Akt, p42/44 and STAT3, which are known to play critical roles in ovarian cancer growth and progression. To examine the therapeutic potential of GSNO in vivo, nude mice bearing intra-peritoneal xenografts of human A2780 ovarian carcinoma cell line (2 × 10(6)) were orally administered GSNO at the dose of 1 mg/kg body weight. Daily oral administration of GSNO significantly attenuated tumor mass (p<0.001) in the peritoneal cavity compared to vehicle (phosphate buffered saline) treated group at 4 weeks. GSNO also potentiated cisplatin mediated tumor toxicity in an A2780 ovarian carcinoma nude mouse model. GSNO's nitrosylating ability was reflected in the induced nitrosylation of various known proteins including NFκB p65, Akt and EGFR. As a novel finding, we observed that GSNO also induced nitrosylation with inverse relationship at tyrosine 705 phosphorylation of STAT3, an established player in chemoresistance and cell proliferation in ovarian cancer and in cancer in general. Overall, our study underlines the significance of S-nitrosylation of key cancer promoting proteins in modulating ovarian cancer and proposes the therapeutic potential of nitrosylating agents (like GSNO) for the treatment of ovarian cancer alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsBiotinCell DeathCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCisplatinDNADrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug SynergismFemaleHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMice, NudeNeoplasm InvasivenessBiotinCisplatinDNAIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsS-NitrosoglutathioneSTAT3 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID24887420
PMCPMC4041717
OpenAlexW1981312135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.