Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24887392›Full record

Observational studyJAMA internal medicine2014

5α-Reductase inhibitors and risk of high-grade or lethal prostate cancer.

Mark A Preston, Kathryn M Wilson, Sarah C Markt, Rongbin Ge, Christopher Morash, Meir J Stampfer, Massimo Loda, Edward Giovannucci, Lorelei A Mucci, Aria F Olumi

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Statins and Cancer Prevention-Association Does Not Mean Causation.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Round up.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mark A PrestonDepartment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Kathryn M WilsonDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts3Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sarah C MarktDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rongbin GeDepartment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Christopher MorashDivision of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Meir J StampferDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts3Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Massimo LodaDepartments of Pathology and Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's and Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts6Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts7Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, En.
Edward GiovannucciDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts3Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts8Department of Nutrition, Harva.
Lorelei A MucciDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts3Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Aria F OlumiDepartment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Funding

Validity of Diet and Activity Measures in WomenP01CA055075 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI RIMM, ERIC B · 1991 to 2009
$41.8M
Training Program in Cancer EpidemiologyT32CA009001 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI A. Heather Eliassen, Meir Stampfer · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
Cancer Epidemiology Cohort in Male Health ProfessionalsUM1CA167552 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI WILLETT, WALTER C. · 2012 to 2016
$11.5M
Nutritional Epidemiology of Cancer Education and Career Development ProgramR25CA098566 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI STAMPFER, MEIR · 2003 to 2013
$4.5M
Energy Balance-Related Hormones & Prostate Cancer Incidence & ProgressionR01CA133891 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI GIOVANNUCCI, EDWARD · 2008 to 2012
$3.3M
Reduced Levels of 5-alpha Reductase 2 in Adult Prostate Tissue: Implications forR01DK091353 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI OLUMI, ARIA F · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA133891NCI NIH HHS P01 CA055075NCI NIH HHS R01 CA133891NCI NIH HHS R25 CA098566NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009001NCI NIH HHS T32 CA09001NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA167552NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK091353NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK 091353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importance5α-Reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) are widely used for benign prostatic hyperplasia despite controversy regarding potential risk of high-grade prostate cancer with use. Furthermore, the effect of 5ARIs on progression and prostate cancer death remains unclear.

objectiveTo determine the association between 5ARI use and development of high-grade or lethal prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsProspective observational study of 38,058 men followed up for prostate cancer diagnosis and outcomes between 1996 and 2010 in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. EXPOSURES: Use of 5ARIs between 1996 and 2010. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate risk of prostate cancer diagnosis or development of lethal disease with 5ARI use, adjusting for possible confounders including prostate specific antigen testing.

resultsDuring 448,803 person-years of follow-up, we ascertained 3681 incident prostate cancer cases. Of these, 289 were lethal (metastatic or fatal), 456 were high grade (Gleason sum [GS] 8-10), 1238 were GS 7, and 1600 were low grade (GS 2-6). A total of 2878 (7.6%) men reported use of 5ARIs between 1996 and 2010. After adjusting for confounders, men who reported ever using 5ARIs over the study period had a reduced risk of overall prostate cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65-0.91). 5ARI users had a reduced risk of GS 7 (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49-0.91) and low-grade (GS 2-6) prostate cancer (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57-0.95). 5ARI use was not associated with risk of high-grade (GS 8-10) prostate cancer (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.64-1.46) or lethal disease (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.58-1.69). Increased duration of use was associated with significantly lower risk of overall prostate cancer (HR for 1 year of additional use, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99), localized (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00), and low-grade disease (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-0.99). There was no association for lethal, high-grade, or grade 7 disease. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: While 5ARI use was not associated with developing high-grade or lethal prostate cancer, it was associated with a reduction in low-grade, GS 7, and overall prostate cancer. Because the number of patients with high-grade or lethal prostate cancer in our cohort was limited, we cannot rule out potential risk of harm with 5ARI use.

Indexed as

5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsAdultAgedCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesProstatic HyperplasiaProstatic NeoplasmsRisk Factors5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID24887392
PMCPMC4122627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.