ArticleSystematic reviews2014
Micro-costing studies in the health and medical literature: protocol for a systematic review.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 74 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Outcomes of Differentiated Models of Antiretroviral Treatment (ART) Provision: Multi-Month Dispensing (MMD) of ART in Community ART Distribution for Stable HIV Infected Patients
Dialogue Around Respiratory Illness Treatment for Family Practice (DART -FP)
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of the methodological quality of economic evaluations in genetic screening and testing for monogenic disorders.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022Pooled it
- What Are the Real Procedural Costs of Bariatric Surgery? A Systematic Literature Review of Published Cost Analyses.Obesity surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The economic costs and cost-effectiveness of HIV self-testing among truck drivers in Kenya.Health policy and planning · 2024Trial
- Cost of Home-Based Couples Human Immunodeficiency Virus Counseling and Testing and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Self-Testing During Pregnancy and Postpartum in Southwestern Kenya.Value in health regional issues · 2023Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of High-intensity Training vs Conventional Therapy for Individuals With Subacute Stroke.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2022Trial
- Costs, benefits, and cost-benefit of Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality versus enhanced treatment as usual.PloS one · 2022Trial
- The Cost-Effectiveness of Adapting and Implementing a Brief Intervention to Target Frequent Alcohol Use Among Persons with HIV in Vietnam.AIDS and behavior · 2021Trial
- Findings from a pilot randomised trial of a social network self-management intervention in COPD.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2020Trial
- Micro-costing and a cost-consequence analysis of the 'Girls Active' programme: A cluster randomised controlled trial.PloS one · 2019Trial
- Effectiveness and micro-costing of the KiVa school-based bullying prevention programme in Wales: study protocol for a pragmatic definitive parallel group cluster randomised controlled trial.BMC public health · 2016Trial
- Estimation of direct and indirect costs associated with obesity treatment interventions among adult populations in Iran.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Cost analysis of hospitalized children suspected of rare genetic diseases.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Hospital-based health technology assessment of central dialysis fluid delivery system for hemodialysis patients.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluating the costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a systematic review.Health economics review · 2024Review
- Cost of illness of the vaccine-preventable diseases influenza, herpes zoster and pneumococcal disease in France.European journal of public health · 2024Article
- What are the observed procedural costs of vascular access surgery? Protocol for a systematic review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Day Admission Surgery Program in a Prospective Payment System: What Are the Financial Incentives?Health services insights · 2024Article
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicro-costing is a cost estimation method that allows for precise assessment of the economic costs of health interventions. It has been demonstrated to be particularly useful for estimating the costs of new interventions, for interventions with large variability across providers, and for estimating the true costs to the health system and to society. However, existing guidelines for economic evaluations do not provide sufficient detail of the methods and techniques to use when conducting micro-costing analyses. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to review the current literature on micro-costing studies of health and medical interventions, strategies, and programs to assess the variation in micro-costing methodology and the quality of existing studies. This will inform current practice in conducting and reporting micro-costing studies and lead to greater standardization in methodology in the future. METHODS/
designWe will perform a systematic review of the current literature on micro-costing studies of health and medical interventions, strategies, and programs. Using rigorously designed search strategies, we will search Ovid MEDLINE, EconLit, BIOSIS Previews, Embase, Scopus, and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED) to identify relevant English-language articles. These searches will be supplemented by a review of the references of relevant articles identified. Two members of the review team will independently extract detailed information on the design and characteristics of each included article using a standardized data collection form. A third reviewer will be consulted to resolve discrepancies. We will use checklists that have been developed for critical appraisal of health economics studies to evaluate the quality and potential risk of bias of included studies. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide useful information to help standardize the methods and techniques for conducting and reporting micro-costing studies in research, which can improve the quality and transparency of future studies and enhance comparability and interpretation of findings. In the long run, these efforts will facilitate clinical and health policy decision-making about resource allocation.
trial registrationSystematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42014007453.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.