Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24887208›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2014

Micro-costing studies in the health and medical literature: protocol for a systematic review.

Xiao Xu, Holly K Grossetta Nardini, Jennifer Prah Ruger

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 74 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03438370 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Outcomes of Differentiated Models of Antiretroviral Treatment (ART) Provision: Multi-Month Dispensing (MMD) of ART in Community ART Distribution for Stable HIV Infected Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorEquip, LesothoRan2017 to 2019Enrolled5,760ConditionsHIV/AIDSArmsThree monthly ART supply at CAGs, Six monthly ART supply at outreaches
NCT03674775 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Dialogue Around Respiratory Illness Treatment for Family Practice (DART -FP)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeattle Children's HospitalRan2022 to 2026Enrolled180ConditionsAcute Respiratory Tract InfectionArmsDART QI Program Participation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of the methodological quality of economic evaluations in genetic screening and testing for monogenic disorders.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiao XuDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street, LSOG 205B, PO Box 208063, 06520 New Haven, CT, USA. xiao.xu@yale.edu.
Holly K Grossetta Nardini
Jennifer Prah Ruger

Funding

Economic Evaluation of Drug Abuse Treatment and HIV Prevention Services for PregnR01DA025555 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PRAH RUGER, JENNIFER · 2009 to 2012
$2.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025555NIDA NIH HHS R01DA025555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicro-costing is a cost estimation method that allows for precise assessment of the economic costs of health interventions. It has been demonstrated to be particularly useful for estimating the costs of new interventions, for interventions with large variability across providers, and for estimating the true costs to the health system and to society. However, existing guidelines for economic evaluations do not provide sufficient detail of the methods and techniques to use when conducting micro-costing analyses. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to review the current literature on micro-costing studies of health and medical interventions, strategies, and programs to assess the variation in micro-costing methodology and the quality of existing studies. This will inform current practice in conducting and reporting micro-costing studies and lead to greater standardization in methodology in the future. METHODS/

designWe will perform a systematic review of the current literature on micro-costing studies of health and medical interventions, strategies, and programs. Using rigorously designed search strategies, we will search Ovid MEDLINE, EconLit, BIOSIS Previews, Embase, Scopus, and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED) to identify relevant English-language articles. These searches will be supplemented by a review of the references of relevant articles identified. Two members of the review team will independently extract detailed information on the design and characteristics of each included article using a standardized data collection form. A third reviewer will be consulted to resolve discrepancies. We will use checklists that have been developed for critical appraisal of health economics studies to evaluate the quality and potential risk of bias of included studies. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide useful information to help standardize the methods and techniques for conducting and reporting micro-costing studies in research, which can improve the quality and transparency of future studies and enhance comparability and interpretation of findings. In the long run, these efforts will facilitate clinical and health policy decision-making about resource allocation.

trial registrationSystematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42014007453.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Services ResearchHumansSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID24887208
PMCPMC4036677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.