Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24887101›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2014

High dose tigecycline in critically ill patients with severe infections due to multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Gennaro De Pascale, Luca Montini, Mariano Pennisi, Valentina Bernini, Riccardo Maviglia, Giuseppe Bello, Teresa Spanu, Mario Tumbarello, Massimo Antonelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 240 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Population Pharmacokinetics of Tigecycline: A Systematic Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Tigecycline pharmacodynamics in the hollow fiber system ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gennaro De Pascale
Luca Montini
Mariano Pennisi
Valentina Bernini
Riccardo Maviglia
Giuseppe Bello
Teresa Spanu
Mario Tumbarello
Massimo Antonelli
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe high incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria among patients admitted to ICUs has determined an increase of tigecycline (TGC) use for the treatment of severe infections. Many concerns have been raised about the efficacy of this molecule and increased dosages have been proposed. Our purpose is to investigate TGC safety and efficacy at higher than standard doses.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of prospectively collected data in the ICU of a teaching hospital in Rome. Data from all patients treated with TGC for a microbiologically confirmed infection were analyzed. The safety profile and efficacy of high dosing regimen use were investigated.

resultsOver the study period, 54 patients (pts) received TGC at a standard dose (SD group: 50 mg every 12 hours) and 46 at a high dose (HD group: 100 mg every 12 hours). Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter.baumannii (blaOXA-58 and blaOXA-23 genes) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (blaKPC-3 gene) were the main isolated pathogens (n = 79). There were no patients requiring TGC discontinuation or dose reduction because of adverse events. In the ventilation-associated pneumonia population (VAP) subgroup (63 patients: 30 received SD and 33 HD), the only independent predictor of clinical cure was the use of high tigecycline dose (odds ratio (OR) 6.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59 to 24.57; P = 0.009) whilst initial inadequate antimicrobial treatment (IIAT) (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.68; P = 0.01) and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.87; P = 0.003) were independently associated with clinical failure.

conclusionsTGC was well tolerated at a higher than standard dose in a cohort of critically ill patients with severe infections. In the VAP subgroup the high-dose regimen was associated with better outcomes than conventional administration due to Gram-negative MDR bacteria.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCritical IllnessDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedMinocyclineProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTigecyclineAnti-Bacterial AgentsMinocyclineTigecycline

Identifiers

PMID24887101
PMCPMC4057423
OpenAlexW2064648176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.