Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24886988›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated phage resistance is not impeded by the DNA modifications of phage T4.

Stephanie J Yaung, Kevin M Esvelt, George M Church

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A pentose, as a cytosine nucleobase modification inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Identification and biosynthesis of thymidine hypermodifications in the genomic DNA of widespread bacterial viruses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie J YaungWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America; Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America; Program in Medical Engineering & Medical Physics, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Kevin M EsveltWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
George M ChurchWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America; Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Harvard University · USHarvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology · US

Funding

Sculpting the Enteric Microbiota with CRISPR-Cas SystemsR00DK102669 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ESVELT, KEVIN · 2016 to 2017
$496k
Sculpting the Enteric Microbiota with CRISPR-Cas SystemsK99DK102669 · NIDDK · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI ESVELT, KEVIN · 2014 to 2015
$180k
NIDDK NIH HHS K99 DK102669NIDDK NIH HHS R00 DK102669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria rely on two known DNA-level defenses against their bacteriophage predators: restriction-modification and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems. Certain phages have evolved countermeasures that are known to block endonucleases. For example, phage T4 not only adds hydroxymethyl groups to all of its cytosines, but also glucosylates them, a strategy that defeats almost all restriction enzymes. We sought to determine whether these DNA modifications can similarly impede CRISPR-based defenses. In a bioinformatics search, we found naturally occurring CRISPR spacers that potentially target phages known to modify their DNA. Experimentally, we show that the Cas9 nuclease from the Type II CRISPR system of Streptococcus pyogenes can overcome a variety of DNA modifications in Escherichia coli. The levels of Cas9-mediated phage resistance to bacteriophage T4 and the mutant phage T4 gt, which contains hydroxymethylated but not glucosylated cytosines, were comparable to phages with unmodified cytosines, T7 and the T4-like phage RB49. Our results demonstrate that Cas9 is not impeded by N6-methyladenine, 5-methylcytosine, 5-hydroxymethylated cytosine, or glucosylated 5-hydroxymethylated cytosine.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas Systems5-MethylcytosineBacteriophage T4Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsCytosineDNA, BacterialEndonucleasesEscherichia coliStreptococcus pyogenes5-hydroxymethylcytosine5-MethylcytosineCRISPR-Associated ProteinsCytosineDNA, BacterialEndonucleases

Identifiers

PMID24886988
PMCPMC4041780
OpenAlexW2124638114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.