Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24886911›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

A meta analysis of lumbar spinal fusion surgery using bone morphogenetic proteins and autologous iliac crest bone graft.

Haifei Zhang, Feng Wang, Lin Ding, Zhiyu Zhang, Deri Sun, Xinmin Feng, Jiuli An, Yue Zhu

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Bone morphogenetic protein in adult spinal deformity surgery: a meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Navigating diagnostic challenges:Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Interbody options in lumbar fusion.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Haifei ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, The first Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Feng WangDepartment of Orthopedics, The fourth Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Lin DingChina Medical University Computer Center, Shenyang, China.
Zhiyu ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, The fourth Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Deri SunDepartment of Orthopedics, The fourth Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Xinmin FengDepartment of Orthopedics, The fourth Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Jiuli AnDepartment of Orthopedics, The fourth Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yue ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, The first Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University · CNChina Medical University · CNFirst Hospital of China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone morphogenetic protein (BMPs) as a substitute for iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) has been increasingly widely used in lumbar fusion. The purpose of this study is to systematically compare the effectiveness and safety of fusion with BMPs for the treatment of lumbar disease.

methodsCochrane review methods were used to analyze all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to nov 2013.

results19 RCTs (1,852 patients) met the inclusion criteria. BMPs group significantly increased fusion rate (RR: 1.13; 95% CI 1.05-1.23, P = 0.001), while there was no statistical difference in overall success of clinical outcomes (RR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.95-1.13, P = 0.38) and complications (RR: 0.96; 95% CI 0.85-1.09, p = 0.54). A significant reduction of the reoperation rate was found in BMPs group (RR: 0.57; 95% CI 0.42-0.77, p = 0.0002). Significant difference was found in the operating time (MD-0.32; 95% CI-0.55, -0.08; P = 0.009), but no significant difference was found in the blood loss, the hospital stay, patient satisfaction, and work status.

conclusionCompared with ICBG, BMPs in lumbar fusion can increase the fusion rate, while reduce the reoperation rate and operating time. However, it doesn't increase the complication rate, the amount of blood loss and hospital stay. No significant difference was found in the overall success of clinical outcome of the two groups.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationSpinal FusionAdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalBone Morphogenetic ProteinsFemaleHumansIliumLength of StayLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsBone Morphogenetic Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24886911
PMCPMC4041715
OpenAlexW2015279823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.