Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24886889›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2014

Programmed DNA elimination in multicellular organisms.

Jianbin Wang, Richard E Davis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Programmed DNA elimination was present in the last common ancestor ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jianbin WangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States. Electronic address: jianbin.wang@ucdenver.edu.
Richard E DavisDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States. Electronic address: richard.davis@ucdenver.edu.

Funding

IN VIVO ANALYSIS OF SL ADDITION IN ASCARIS EMBRYOSR01AI049558 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI DAVIS, RICHARD E. · 2000 to 2015
$4.8M
Chromatin Diminution in AscarisR21AI098421 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI DAVIS, RICHARD E. · 2012 to 2013
$423k
NIAID NIH HHS AI0149558NIAID NIH HHS AI098421NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI049558NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI098421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic information typically remains constant in all cells throughout the life cycle of most organisms. However, there are exceptions where DNA elimination is an integral, developmental program for some organisms, associated with generating distinct germline versus somatic genomes. Programmed DNA elimination occurs in unicellular ciliates and diverse metazoa ranging from nematodes to vertebrates. DNA elimination can occur through chromosome breakage and selective loss of chromosome regions or the elimination of individual chromosomes. Recent studies provide compelling evidence that DNA elimination is a novel form of gene silencing, dosage compensation, and sex determination. Further identification of the eliminated sequences, genome changes, and in depth characterization of this phenomenon in diverse metazoans is needed to shed new light on the functions and mechanisms of this regulated process.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCell NucleusChromosomesDNADNA

Identifiers

PMID24886889
PMCPMC4125452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.