Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24886852›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2014

Non-medical prescription opioid use, prescription opioid-related harms and public health in Canada: an update 5 years later.

Benedikt Fischer, Jenna Gooch, Brian Goldman, Paul Kurdyak, Jürgen Rehm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sensitivity to change of generic preference-based instruments (EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and HUI3) in the context of treatment for people with prescription-type opioid use disorder in Canada.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The risk of infective endocarditis among people who inject drugs: a retrospective, population-based time series analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Novel case of maternal and neonatal kratom dependence and withdrawal.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effective Canadian policy to reduce harms from prescription opioids: learning from past failures.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benedikt FischerCentre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction (CARMHA), Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver; Social and Epidemiological Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto. bfischer@sfu.ca.
Jenna Gooch
Brian Goldman
Paul Kurdyak
Jürgen Rehm

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research GIR-109852Canadian Institutes of Health Research SAF-94814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Five years ago, we highlighted Canada's emerging problem of prescription opioid (PO)-related harms and emphasized the need for targeted surveillance, research and interventions. Overall levels of PO use in the Canadian population have grown by 70% since then, while at the same time levels of non-medical PO use (NMPOU) in general and in key risk populations have continued to be high; furthermore, PO-related harms - specifically morbidity (e.g., treatment admissions) and mortality (e.g., overdose deaths) - have risen substantively. Unfortunately, major knowledge gaps related to systematic monitoring of PO-related harms continue to exist; for example, no national morbidity or mortality statistics are available. Investigator-driven research has generated important insights into the epidemiology and impacts of PO-related harms: high correlations between population-level PO dispensing and/or PO dosing and harms; high rates of co-occurrence of NMPOU and co-morbidities; and distinct NMPOU-related risk dynamics among street drug users. Select policy measures have been implemented only recently at the federal and provincial levels; these interventions remain to be systematically evaluated, especially given preliminary indications of reductions in PO-related harms (e.g., NMPOU) unfolding prior to the interventions. For these purposes, improvements in surveillance tools and research resources devoted to the extensive public health problem of PO-related harms in Canada continue to be urgently needed.

Indexed as

Public HealthAnalgesics, OpioidCanadaFollow-Up StudiesHumansOpioid-Related DisordersPrescription Drug MisuseAnalgesics, OpioidCanadaharmsnon-medical usepolicyPrescription opioidspublic healthsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID24886852
PMCPMC6972194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.