Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24886851›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2014

[Solutions for the better integration of public health ethical considerations].

Michel Désy, David Hughes, France Filiatrault

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michel DésyInstitut national de santé publique du Québec. michel.desy@inspq.qc.ca.
David Hughes
France Filiatrault

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public Health Ethics (PHE) has grown significantly during the past decade. Despite PHE’s relevance, its integration into public health practices, resources, activities and knowledge is lacking. In our view, this lack of integration can be understood as a problem of knowledge transfer (KT). In this article, we briefly describe existing knowledge integration methods and their limitations for PHE. We then explore the KT literature to underline how recent research in this area presents possible solutions to the problem before us. The proposed solutions stress the importance, first, of adapting knowledge and tools to the needs of users and the context of their practice, and, second, of recognizing the personal, continual nature of interactions between actors. We conclude that it would be beneficial to public health organizations to count on the presence and expertise of PHE knowledge brokers in order to build, in partnership with knowledge users, tools that will allow them to achieve PHE integration in public health practices, resources, activities and knowledge.

Indexed as

Knowledge ManagementCanadaCapacity BuildingHumansPublic Health Practicecadres éthiqueséthiqueformation en éthiquerenforcement des capacitéssanté publiquetransfert des connaissances

Identifiers

PMID24886851
PMCPMC6972384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.