Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24886718›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Protective epitopes of the Plasmodium falciparum SERA5 malaria vaccine reside in intrinsically unstructured N-terminal repetitive sequences.

Masanori Yagi, Gilles Bang, Takahiro Tougan, Nirianne M Q Palacpac, Nobuko Arisue, Taiki Aoshi, Yoshitsugu Matsumoto, Ken J Ishii, Thomas G Egwang, Pierre Druilhe and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Antibody Responses to the ConservedPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of Synthetic Peptides fromACS infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. African-specific polymorphisms inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Computational Clues of Immunogenic Hotspots inBioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Assessment of MixedCancers · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Masanori YagiDepartment of Molecular Protozoology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Gilles BangLaboratoire de Parasitologie Bio-Médicale, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Takahiro TouganDepartment of Molecular Protozoology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Nirianne M Q PalacpacDepartment of Molecular Protozoology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Nobuko ArisueDepartment of Molecular Protozoology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Taiki AoshiLaboratory of Adjuvant Innovation, National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Ibaraki, Osaka, Japan; Laboratory of Vaccine Science, Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshitsugu MatsumotoLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken J IshiiLaboratory of Adjuvant Innovation, National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Ibaraki, Osaka, Japan; Laboratory of Vaccine Science, Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Thomas G EgwangMed Biotech Laboratories, Kampala, Uganda.
Pierre DruilheLaboratoire de Parasitologie Bio-Médicale, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Toshihiro HoriiDepartment of Molecular Protozoology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka University · JPInstitut Pasteur · FRNational Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The malaria vaccine candidate antigen, SE36, is based on the N-terminal 47 kDa domain of Plasmodium falciparum serine repeat antigen 5 (SERA5). In epidemiological studies, we have previously shown the inhibitory effects of SE36 specific antibodies on in vitro parasite growth and the negative correlation between antibody level and malaria symptoms. A phase 1 b trial of the BK-SE36 vaccine in Uganda elicited 72% protective efficacy against symptomatic malaria in children aged 6-20 years during the follow-up period 130-365 days post-second vaccination. Here, we performed epitope mapping with synthetic peptides covering the whole sequence of SE36 to identify and map dominant epitopes in Ugandan adult serum presumed to have clinical immunity to P. falciparum malaria. High titer sera from the Ugandan adults predominantly reacted with peptides corresponding to two successive N-terminal regions of SERA5 containing octamer repeats and serine rich sequences, regions of SERA5 that were previously reported to have limited polymorphism. Affinity purified antibodies specifically recognizing the octamer repeats and serine rich sequences exhibited a high antibody-dependent cellular inhibition (ADCI) activity that inhibited parasite growth. Furthermore, protein structure predictions and structural analysis of SE36 using spectroscopic methods indicated that N-terminal regions possessing inhibitory epitopes are intrinsically unstructured. Collectively, these results suggest that strict tertiary structure of SE36 epitopes is not required to elicit protective antibodies in naturally immune Ugandan adults.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimalsChildEpitopesHumansMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesPlasmodium falciparumSaimiriYoung AdultEpitopesMalaria Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID24886718
PMCPMC4041889
OpenAlexW2169185843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.