Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24886589›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2014

Canine infection with Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in the United States, 2010-2012.

Susan E Little, Melissa J Beall, Dwight D Bowman, Ramaswamy Chandrashekar, John Stamaris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Heat Treatment Augments Antigen Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Treatment of dogs with BravectoParasites & vectors · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Heartworm disease - Overview, intervention, and industry perspective.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  18. Epidemiological and Clinicopathological Features ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susan E LittleDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Room 250 McElroy Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA. susan.little@okstate.edu.
Melissa J Beall
Dwight D Bowman
Ramaswamy Chandrashekar
John Stamaris

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe geographic distribution of canine infection with vector-borne disease agents in the United States appears to be expanding.

methodsTo provide an updated assessment of geographic trends in canine infection with Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia spp., and Anaplasma spp., we evaluated results from an average of 3,588,477 dogs tested annually by veterinarians throughout the United States from 2010 - 2012.

resultsAs in an earlier summary report, the percent positive test results varied by agent and region, with antigen of D. immitis and antibody to Ehrlichia spp. most commonly identified in the Southeast (2.9% and 3.2%, respectively) and antibody to both B. burgdorferi and Anaplasma spp. most commonly identified in the Northeast (13.3% and 7.1%, respectively) and upper Midwest (4.4% and 3.9%, respectively). Percent positive test results for D. immitis antigen were lower in every region considered, including in the Southeast, than previously reported. Percent positive test results for antibodies to B. burgdorferi and Ehrlichia spp. were higher nationally than previously reported, and, for antibodies to Anaplasma spp., were higher in the Northeast but lower in the Midwest and West, than in the initial report. Annual reports of human cases of Lyme disease, ehrlichiosis, and anaplasmosis were associated with percent positive canine test results by state for each respective tick-borne disease agent (R2=0.701, 0.457, and 0.314, respectively). Within endemic areas, percent positive test results for all three tick-borne agents demonstrated evidence of geographic expansion.

conclusionsContinued national monitoring of canine test results for vector-borne zoonotic agents is an important tool for accurately mapping the geographic distribution of these agents, and greatly aids our understanding of the veterinary and public health threats they pose.

Indexed as

AnaplasmaAnaplasmosisAnimalsArachnid VectorsBorrelia burgdorferiDirofilaria immitisDirofilariasisDog DiseasesDogsEhrlichiaEhrlichiosisInsect VectorsLyme DiseaseTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24886589
PMCPMC4057565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.