Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24886523›Full record

ReviewMolecular cancer2014

MUC16 (CA125): tumor biomarker to cancer therapy, a work in progress.

Mildred Felder, Arvinder Kapur, Jesus Gonzalez-Bosquet, Sachi Horibata, Joseph Heintz, Ralph Albrecht, Lucas Fass, Justanjyot Kaur, Kevin Hu, Hadi Shojaei and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 284 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
284citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
33.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

284 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 549 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Morphological and molecular characterization of epithelial ovarian cancer: SEOM-SEAP consensus guidelines for biomarker integration in clinical practice.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Chemoradiotherapy facilitates siglec-10Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

224 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mildred Felder
Arvinder Kapur
Jesus Gonzalez-Bosquet
Sachi Horibata
Joseph Heintz
Ralph Albrecht
Lucas Fass
Justanjyot Kaur
Kevin Hu
Hadi Shojaei
Rebecca J WhelanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53792, USA. rwhelan@oberlin.edu.
Manish S Patankar
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USOberlin College · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AMY TRENTHAM-DIETZ · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Development of aptamer-based detection and therapy strategies for ovarian cancerR15CA161970 · NCI · OBERLIN COLLEGE · PI WHELAN, REBECCA JEAN · 2011 to 2017
$382k
Ovarian cancer diagnosis by monitoring immune cell bound MUC16 (CA125)R21CA143616 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PATANKAR, MANISH S · 2010 to 2011
$350k
Improving Ovarian Cancer Treatment by Targeting a Novel Epitope of MUC16R41CA132520 · NCI · NEOCLONE BIOTECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL · PI CONNOR, JOSEPH P, KRAVITZ, RACHEL HANNAH · 2009 to 2009
$191k
NCI NIH HHS 1R15CA161970-01NCI NIH HHS 1R21CA143616-01NCI NIH HHS 1R41CA132520-01A2NCI NIH HHS CA14520NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over three decades have passed since the first report on the expression of CA125 by ovarian tumors. Since that time our understanding of ovarian cancer biology has changed significantly to the point that these tumors are now classified based on molecular phenotype and not purely on histological attributes. However, CA125 continues to be, with the recent exception of HE4, the only clinically reliable diagnostic marker for ovarian cancer. Many large-scale clinical trials have been conducted or are underway to determine potential use of serum CA125 levels as a screening modality or to distinguish between benign and malignant pelvic masses. CA125 is a peptide epitope of a 3-5 million Da mucin, MUC16. Here we provide an in-depth review of the literature to highlight the importance of CA125 as a prognostic and diagnostic marker for ovarian cancer. We focus on the increasing body of literature describing the biological role of MUC16 in the progression and metastasis of ovarian tumors. Finally, we consider previous and on-going efforts to develop therapeutic approaches to eradicate ovarian tumors by targeting MUC16. Even though CA125 is a crucial marker for ovarian cancer, the exact structural definition of this antigen continues to be elusive. The importance of MUC16/CA125 in the diagnosis, progression and therapy of ovarian cancer warrants the need for in-depth research on the biochemistry and biology of this mucin. A renewed focus on MUC16 is likely to culminate in novel and more efficient strategies for the detection and treatment of ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenClinical Trials as TopicDisease ProgressionFemaleGene ExpressionHumansKiller Cells, NaturalMembrane ProteinsNeoplasm MetastasisOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisProteinsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenMembrane ProteinsMUC16 protein, humanProteinsWAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2WFDC2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24886523
PMCPMC4046138
OpenAlexW1975303054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.