Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24886406›Full record

ArticleMolecular pain2014

Role of spinal P2Y6 and P2Y11 receptors in neuropathic pain in rats: possible involvement of glial cells.

Paulino Barragán-Iglesias, Jorge Baruch Pineda-Farias, Claudia Cervantes-Durán, Mariana Bravo-Hernández, Héctor Isaac Rocha-González, Janet Murbartián, Vinicio Granados-Soto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pain, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Glial cells in neuropathic pain.Physiological reviews · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Neuropathic pain; what we know and what we should do about it.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Efficacy of a vegetal mixture composed ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. A GeLife · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paulino Barragán-Iglesias
Jorge Baruch Pineda-Farias
Claudia Cervantes-Durán
Mariana Bravo-Hernández
Héctor Isaac Rocha-González
Janet Murbartián
Vinicio Granados-SotoNeurobiology of Pain Laboratory, Departamento de Farmacobiología, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados (Cinvestav), Sede Sur, Calzada de los Tenorios 235, Colonia Granjas Coapa, 14330 México, D,F,, México. vinicio_granadossoto@hotmail.com.
Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute · MXInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe participation of spinal P2X receptors in neuropathic pain is well recognized. However, the role of P2Y receptors has been less studied. The purpose of this study was to investigate the contribution of spinal P2Y6,11 receptors following peripheral nerve damage induced by spinal nerve ligation. In addition, we determined the expression of P2Y6,11 receptors in the dorsal spinal cord in presence of the selective P2Y6,11 receptors antagonists. Furthermore, we evaluated the participation of spinal microglia and astrocytes in the pronociceptive role of P2Y6,11 receptors.

resultsSpinal administration of the selective P2Y6 (MRS2578, 10-100 μM) and P2Y11 (NF340, 0.3-30 μM) receptor antagonists reduced tactile allodynia in spinal nerve ligated rats. Nerve injury increased the expression of P2Y6,11 receptors at 7, 14 and 21 days after injury. Furthermore, intrathecal administration of MRS2578 (100 μM/day) and NF340 (30 μM/day) for 3 days significantly reduced spinal nerve injury-induced increase in P2Y6,11 receptors expression, respectively. Spinal treatment (on day 14 after injury) with minocycline (100 μg/day) or fluorocitrate (1 nmol/day) for 7 days reduced tactile allodynia and spinal nerve injury-induced up-regulation in Iba-1 and GFAP, respectively. In addition, minocycline reduced nerve injury-induced up-regulation in P2Y6,11 receptors whereas that fluorocitrate diminished P2Y11, but not P2Y6, receptors up-regulation. Intrathecal treatment (on day 21 after injury) with the selective P2Y6 (PSB0474, 3-30 μM) and P2Y11 (NF546, 1-10 μM) receptor agonists produced remarkable tactile allodynia in nerve ligated rats previously treated with minocycline or fluorocitrate for 7 days.

conclusionsOur data suggest that spinal P2Y6 is present in spinal microglia while P2Y11 receptors are present in both spinal microglia and astrocytes, and both receptors are up-regulated in rats subjected to spinal nerve injury. In addition, our data suggest that the spinal P2Y6 and P2Y11 receptors participate in the maintenance of neuropathic pain.

Indexed as

AnimalsCitratesDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFunctional LateralityGene ExpressionHyperalgesiaIsothiocyanatesMinocyclineNeuralgiaNeurogliaPain MeasurementPurinergic P2X Receptor AgonistsPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsRatsCitratesfluorocitrateIsothiocyanatesMinocyclineN,N''-1,4-butanediylbis(N'-(3-isothiocyanatophenyl))thioureaPurinergic P2X Receptor AgonistsPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Purinergic P2YThiourea

Identifiers

PMID24886406
PMCPMC4039548
OpenAlexW2168730807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.