Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24886242›Full record

SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2014

Treatment of acute pancreatitis with protease inhibitors administered through intravenous infusion: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Takeshi Seta, Yoshinori Noguchi, Satoru Shikata, Takeo Nakayama

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Pathologically relevant trypsinogen activation in pancreatitis.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Recent Treatment Strategies for Acute Pancreatitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. [The Latest Knowledge on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-related Pancreatitis].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Drug Therapy for Acute Pancreatitis.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2015
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Takeshi Seta
Yoshinori Noguchi
Satoru Shikata
Takeo NakayamaDepartment of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Yoshida-Konoe, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan. t-nakayama@umin.ac.jp.
Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital · JPKomatsu (Japan) · JPKyoto University · JPNational Mie Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe intravenous use of protease inhibitors in patients with acute pancreatitis is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of protease inhibitors intravenously administered to prevent pancreatitis-associated complications.

methodsWe updated our previous meta-analysis with articles of randomized controlled trials published from January 1965 to March 2013 on the effectiveness of protease inhibitors for acute pancreatitis. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Japana Centra Revuo Medicina was conducted. In addition, Internet-based registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, controlled-trials.com, UMIN, JMACCT, and JAPIC) were used to search for on-going clinical trials. Furthermore, references of review articles and previously published meta-analyses were handsearched. The main outcome of interest was the overall mortality rate from acute pancreatitis.

resultsSeventeen trials were selected for analysis. Overall, protease inhibitors did not achieve a significant risk reduction in mortality (pooled risk difference [RD], -0.02; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], -0.05 to 0.01; number needed to treat [NNT], 74.8) with low heterogeneity. A subgroup analysis in moderate to severe pancreatitis (defined by control mortality rate [CMR] >0.10) did not show a significant effect of protease inhibitors to prevent death (pooled RD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.01; NNT, 1603.9) with low heterogeneity. An additional subgroup analysis of two trials with CMR >0.20 (i.e., low quality) revealed a significant risk reduction.

conclusionThe present meta-analysis re-confirmed that there is no solid evidence that supports the intravenous use of protease inhibitors to prevent death due to acute pancreatitis.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAprotininGabexateHumansInfusions, IntravenousPancreatitisProtease InhibitorsSerine Proteinase InhibitorsSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAprotininGabexateProtease InhibitorsSerine Proteinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID24886242
PMCPMC4061927
OpenAlexW2062810465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.