Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24886216›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

Functional annotation signatures of disease susceptibility loci improve SNP association analysis.

Edwin S Iversen, Gary Lipton, Merlise A Clyde, Alvaro N A Monteiro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edwin S IversenDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Box 90251, 27708-0251 Durham, NC, USA. iversen@stat.duke.edu.
Gary Lipton
Merlise A Clyde
Alvaro N A Monteiro
Duke University · USMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

Ovarian cancer GWAS discovery, expansion and replication (N2 - Project #1)U19CA148112 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI SELLERS, THOMAS A · 2010 to 2014
$10.2M
Bayesian Modeling and Optimal Design for Studies of Gene-Environment AssociationR01HL090559 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI IVERSEN, EDWIN SEVERIN · 2007 to 2009
$1.2M
Models for Consortium Level Analysis of GxE Interaction in Complex DiseaseR21CA165916 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CLYDE, MERLISE A, IVERSEN, EDWIN SEVERIN · 2012 to 2014
$388k
NCI NIH HHS 1U19-CA148112NCI NIH HHS R21 CA165916NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148112NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL090559NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL090559NIEHS NIH HHS R21-ES020796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic association studies are conducted to discover genetic loci that contribute to an inherited trait, identify the variants behind these associations and ascertain their functional role in determining the phenotype. To date, functional annotations of the genetic variants have rarely played more than an indirect role in assessing evidence for association. Here, we demonstrate how these data can be systematically integrated into an association study's analysis plan.

resultsWe developed a Bayesian statistical model for the prior probability of phenotype-genotype association that incorporates data from past association studies and publicly available functional annotation data regarding the susceptibility variants under study. The model takes the form of a binary regression of association status on a set of annotation variables whose coefficients were estimated through an analysis of associated SNPs in the GWAS Catalog (GC). The functional predictors examined included measures that have been demonstrated to correlate with the association status of SNPs in the GC and some whose utility in this regard is speculative: summaries of the UCSC Human Genome Browser ENCODE super-track data, dbSNP function class, sequence conservation summaries, proximity to genomic variants in the Database of Genomic Variants and known regulatory elements in the Open Regulatory Annotation database, PolyPhen-2 probabilities and RegulomeDB categories. Because we expected that only a fraction of the annotations would contribute to predicting association, we employed a penalized likelihood method to reduce the impact of non-informative predictors and evaluated the model's ability to predict GC SNPs not used to construct the model. We show that the functional data alone are predictive of a SNP's presence in the GC. Further, using data from a genome-wide study of ovarian cancer, we demonstrate that their use as prior data when testing for association is practical at the genome-wide scale and improves power to detect associations.

conclusionsWe show how diverse functional annotations can be efficiently combined to create 'functional signatures' that predict the a priori odds of a variant's association to a trait and how these signatures can be integrated into a standard genome-wide-scale association analysis, resulting in improved power to detect truly associated variants.

Indexed as

Genetic LociPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDisease SusceptibilityFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationOvarian Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24886216
PMCPMC4041996
OpenAlexW2170726203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.