Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24886131›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014

Multidimensional mutual information methods for the analysis of covariation in multiple sequence alignments.

Greg W Clark, Sharon H Ackerman, Elisabeth R Tillier, Domenico L Gatti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Protein Residue Contacts and Prediction Methods.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Greg W Clark
Sharon H Ackerman
Elisabeth R TillierDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Campbell Family Institute for Cancer Research, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. e.tillier@utoronto.ca.
Domenico L Gatti

Funding

BIOGENESIS OF THE YEAST MITOCHONDRIAL ATPASE COMPLEXR01GM048157 · NIGMS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ACKERMAN, SHARON H. · 1992 to 2006
$1.3M
Structure, mechanism and evolution of KDO8P synthaseR01GM069840 · NIGMS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GATTI, DOMENICO L · 2004 to 2007
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM48157NIGMS NIH HHS GM69840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral methods are available for the detection of covarying positions from a multiple sequence alignment (MSA). If the MSA contains a large number of sequences, information about the proximities between residues derived from covariation maps can be sufficient to predict a protein fold. However, in many cases the structure is already known, and information on the covarying positions can be valuable to understand the protein mechanism and dynamic properties.

resultsIn this study we have sought to determine whether a multivariate (multidimensional) extension of traditional mutual information (MI) can be an additional tool to study covariation. The performance of two multidimensional MI (mdMI) methods, designed to remove the effect of ternary/quaternary interdependencies, was tested with a set of 9 MSAs each containing <400 sequences, and was shown to be comparable to that of the newest methods based on maximum entropy/pseudolikelyhood statistical models of protein sequences. However, while all the methods tested detected a similar number of covarying pairs among the residues separated by < 8 Å in the reference X-ray structures, there was on average less than 65% overlap between the top scoring pairs detected by methods that are based on different principles.

conclusionsGiven the large variety of structure and evolutionary history of different proteins it is possible that a single best method to detect covariation in all proteins does not exist, and that for each protein family the best information can be derived by merging/comparing results obtained with different methods. This approach may be particularly valuable in those cases in which the size of the MSA is small or the quality of the alignment is low, leading to significant differences in the pairs detected by different methods.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, ProteinModels, StatisticalProteinsProtein Structure, SecondarySequence AlignmentProteins

Identifiers

PMID24886131
PMCPMC4046016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.