Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24886064›Full record

Trial reportBMC neurology2014

The Norwegian tenecteplase stroke trial (NOR-TEST): randomised controlled trial of tenecteplase vs. alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke.

Nicola Logallo, Christopher E Kvistad, Aliona Nacu, Halvor Naess, Ulrike Waje-Andreassen, Jörg Asmuss, Anne Hege Aamodt, Christian Lund, Martin W Kurz, Ole Morten Rønning and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01949948 (Randomised Trial of Tenecteplase vs. Alteplase for Recanalisation in Acute Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01949948 phase3completednot on this map

Randomised Trial of Tenecteplase vs. Alteplase for Recanalisation in Acute Ischemic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorLars ThomassenRan2012 to 2016Enrolled1,050ConditionsIschemic StrokeArmsTenecteplase, Alteplase
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tenecteplase in Ischemic Stroke: Challenge and Opportunity.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. New era of stroke therapy and new challenges.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola LogalloCenter for Neurovascular Diseases, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. nicola.logallo@gmail.com.
Christopher E Kvistad
Aliona Nacu
Halvor Naess
Ulrike Waje-Andreassen
Jörg Asmuss
Anne Hege Aamodt
Christian Lund
Martin W Kurz
Ole Morten Rønning
Rolf Salvesen
Titto T Idicula
Lars Thomassen
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOOslo University Hospital · NOStavanger University Hospital · NOAkershus University Hospital · NONordland Hospital · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlteplase is the only approved thrombolytic agent for acute ischaemic stroke. The overall benefit from alteplase is substantial, but some evidence indicates that alteplase also has negative effects on the ischaemic brain. Tenecteplase may be more effective and less harmfull than alteplase, but large randomised controlled phase 3 trials are lacking. The Norwegian Tenecteplase Stroke Trial (NOR-TEST) aims to compare efficacy and safety of tenecteplase vs. alteplase. METHODS/

designNOR-TEST is a multi-centre PROBE (prospective randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint) trial designed to establish superiority of tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg (single bolus) as compared with alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (10% bolus + 90% infusion/60 minutes) for consecutively admitted patients with acute ischaemic stroke eligible for thrombolytic therapy, i.e. patients a) admitted <4½ hours after symptoms onset; b) admitted <4½ hours after awakening with stroke symptoms c) receiving bridging therapy before embolectomy.Randomisation tenecteplase:alteplase is 1:1. The primary study endpoint is favourable functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale 0-1 at 90 days. Secondary study endpoints are: 1) haemorrhagic transformation (haemorrhagic infarct/haematoma); 2) symptomatic cerebral haemorrhage on CT 24-48 hours; 3) major neurological improvement at 24 hours; 4) recanalisation at 24-36 hours; 5) death. DISCUSSION: NOR-TEST may establish a novel approach to acute ischaemic stroke treatment. A positive result will lead to a more effective, safer and easier treatment for all acute ischaemic stroke pasients.NOR-TEST is reviewed and approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (2011/2435), and The Norwegian Medicines Agency (12/01402). NOR-TEST is registered with EudraCT No 2011-005793-33 and in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01949948).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain IschemiaEmbolectomyEndovascular ProceduresFibrinolytic AgentsHumansMiddle AgedNorwayProspective StudiesStrokeTenecteplaseTissue Plasminogen ActivatorTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultFibrinolytic AgentsTenecteplaseTissue Plasminogen Activator

Identifiers

PMID24886064
PMCPMC4029902
OpenAlexW2156691952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.