Trial reportBMC neurology2014
The Norwegian tenecteplase stroke trial (NOR-TEST): randomised controlled trial of tenecteplase vs. alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke.
Trial report in BMC neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01949948 (Randomised Trial of Tenecteplase vs. Alteplase for Recanalisation in Acute Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomised Trial of Tenecteplase vs. Alteplase for Recanalisation in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Characteristics and predictors of stroke mimics in young patients in the norwegian tenecteplase stroke trial (NOR-TEST).BMC neurology · 2023Article
- Tenecteplase, 0.4 mg/kg, in Moderate and Severe Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pooled Analysis of NOR-TEST and NOR-TEST 2A.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Tecneplase vs. Alteplase in the Acute Treatment of Ischemic Stroke.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Tenecteplase in Ischemic Stroke: Challenge and Opportunity.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2022Review
- Intra-arterial thrombolysis for early hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Mathematical Modelling of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischaemic stroke: Effects of Dose Regimens on Levels of Fibrinolytic Proteins and Clot Lysis Time.Pharmaceutics · 2019Article
- Clinical Importance of Temporal Bone Features for the Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Sonothrombolysis: a Retrospective Analysis of the NOR-SASS Trial.Translational stroke research · 2018Article
- Therapeutic Strategies to Attenuate Hemorrhagic Transformation After Tissue Plasminogen Activator Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2017Review
- Changing Management of Acute Ischaemic Stroke: the New Treatments and Emerging Role of Endovascular Therapy.Current treatment options in neurology · 2016Review
- New era of stroke therapy and new challenges.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2016Article
- Article
- Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke by tenecteplase in the emergency department of a Moroccan hospital.The Pan African medical journal · 2015Article
- Review
- Review
- Wake-up stroke: Dawn of a new era.Brain circulationReview
- Border Zones of Evidence: How Non-evidence Based Factors Influence Evidence Generation and Clinical Practice in Stroke Medicine.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
- Tenecteplase-induced Nonaneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in a Patient with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Case Report and Literature Review.Asian journal of neurosurgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlteplase is the only approved thrombolytic agent for acute ischaemic stroke. The overall benefit from alteplase is substantial, but some evidence indicates that alteplase also has negative effects on the ischaemic brain. Tenecteplase may be more effective and less harmfull than alteplase, but large randomised controlled phase 3 trials are lacking. The Norwegian Tenecteplase Stroke Trial (NOR-TEST) aims to compare efficacy and safety of tenecteplase vs. alteplase. METHODS/
designNOR-TEST is a multi-centre PROBE (prospective randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint) trial designed to establish superiority of tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg (single bolus) as compared with alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (10% bolus + 90% infusion/60 minutes) for consecutively admitted patients with acute ischaemic stroke eligible for thrombolytic therapy, i.e. patients a) admitted <4½ hours after symptoms onset; b) admitted <4½ hours after awakening with stroke symptoms c) receiving bridging therapy before embolectomy.Randomisation tenecteplase:alteplase is 1:1. The primary study endpoint is favourable functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale 0-1 at 90 days. Secondary study endpoints are: 1) haemorrhagic transformation (haemorrhagic infarct/haematoma); 2) symptomatic cerebral haemorrhage on CT 24-48 hours; 3) major neurological improvement at 24 hours; 4) recanalisation at 24-36 hours; 5) death. DISCUSSION: NOR-TEST may establish a novel approach to acute ischaemic stroke treatment. A positive result will lead to a more effective, safer and easier treatment for all acute ischaemic stroke pasients.NOR-TEST is reviewed and approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (2011/2435), and The Norwegian Medicines Agency (12/01402). NOR-TEST is registered with EudraCT No 2011-005793-33 and in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01949948).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.