ArticleBMC public health2014
Who are the under- and never-screened for cancer in Ontario: a qualitative investigation.
Article in BMC public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cancer-related care for rural and remote populations in Canada: A scoping review.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2025Article
- Associations between sociodemographic factors and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in the United States.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Article
- Effects of trauma history on cancer-related screening, diagnosis, and treatment.The Lancet. Oncology · 2023Review
- Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening among Diverse Cultural Groups in Melbourne, Australia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Increasing Cancer Screening Among Old Order Anabaptist Women Through Specialized Women's Health and Integrated Cancer Screening Interventions.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2018Article
- Implementation considerations using HPV self-collection to reach women under-screened for cervical cancer in high-income settings.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2018Article
- Cervical Cancer Screening and Its Associated Factors Among North Korean Defectors Living in South Korea.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2018Article
- Cross-cultural survey development: The Colon Cancer Screening Behaviors Survey for South Asian populations.BMC research notes · 2017Article
- Barriers to cervical cancer screening faced by immigrants: a registry-based study of 1.4 million women in Norway.European journal of public health · 2017Article
- Do Primary Care Provider Strategies Improve Patient Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening?The American journal of gastroenterology · 2017Article
- Factors influencing young men's decision to undergo health screening in Malaysia: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2017Article
- A qualitative cancer screening study with childhood sexual abuse survivors: experiences, perspectives and compassionate care.BMJ open · 2015Article
- Intersectionality and underrepresentation among health care workforce: the case of Arab physicians in Israel.Israel journal of health policy research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObserved breast, cervical and colon cancer screening rates are below provincial targets for the province of Ontario, Canada. The populations who are under- or never-screened for these cancers have not been described at the Ontario provincial level. Our objective was to use qualitative methods of inquiry to explore who are the never- or under-screened populations of Ontario.
methodsQualitative data were collected from two rounds of focus group discussions conducted in four communities selected using maps of screening rates by dissemination area. The communities selected were archetypical of the Ontario context: urban, suburban, small city and rural. The first phase of focus groups was with health service providers. The second phase of focus groups was with community members from the under- and never-screened population. Guided by a grounded theory methodology, data were collected and analyzed simultaneously to enable the core and related concepts about the under- and never-screened to emerge.
resultsThe core concept that emerged from the data is that the under- and never-screened populations of Ontario are characterized by diversity. Group level characteristics of the under- and never-screened included: 1) the uninsured (e.g., Old Order Mennonites and illegal immigrants); 2) sexual abuse survivors; 3) people in crisis; 4) immigrants; 5) men; and 6) individuals accessing traditional, alternative and complementary medicine for health and wellness. Under- and never-screened could have one or multiple group characteristics.
conclusionThe under- and never-screened in Ontario comprise a diversity of groups. Heterogeneity within and intersectionality among under- and never-screened groups adds complexity to cancer screening participation and program planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.