Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24885993›Full record

Trial reportMalaria journal2014

A household randomized, controlled trial of the efficacy of 0.03% transfluthrin coils alone and in combination with long-lasting insecticidal nets on the incidence of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria in Western Yunnan Province, China.

Nigel Hill, Hong Ning Zhou, Piyu Wang, Xiaofang Guo, Ilona Carneiro, Sarah J Moore

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Malaria journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00442442 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Clinical Evaluation of Mosquito Coils to Control Malaria in China

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2007 to 2007Enrolled8,000ConditionsMalariaArmsmosquito coils, LLIN
NCT04766879 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Cluster Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of a Spatial Repellent (the Envelope) on Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria Incidence as Measured by Time to First Infection in Western Kenya

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Notre DameRan2021 to 2023Enrolled5,984ConditionsMalariaArmsTransfluthrin, Placebo
NCT04795648 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Spatial Repellent Products for Control of Vector Borne Diseases

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Notre DameRan2021 to 2024Enrolled1,911ConditionsMalariaArmsTransfluthrin, Placebo
NCT06122142 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Advancing Spatial Repellents for Malaria Control: Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of a Spatial Repellent Under Operational Use in Northern Uganda

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Notre DameRan2024 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsMalariaArmsTransfluthrin - delivery by paid study personnel, Transfluthrin - delivery by voucher system, Transfluthrin - delivery by village health teams
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Mosquito repellents for malaria prevention.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Efficacy of a spatial repellent for control ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Impact of a spatial repellent on malaria incidence in two villages in Sumba, Indonesia.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2014
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Use of Household Insecticides against Mosquitoes in Dengue-Endemic Areas in Sri Lanka.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nigel Hill
Hong Ning Zhou
Piyu Wang
Xiaofang Guo
Ilona Carneiro
Sarah J MooreEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo Research and Training Centre, Bagamoyo, Tanzania. sarah.moore@unibas.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMosquito coils are the most commonly used household insecticidal product in the world with sales exceeding 50 billion coils, used by two billion people worldwide annually. Despite strong evidence that coils prevent mosquito bites a systematic review concluded that there is no evidence that burning mosquito coils prevents malaria acquisition. Therefore, the current trial was designed to measure and compare prevention of malaria infection by mosquito coils or long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) or a combination of the two in Yunnan, China in the Greater Mekong sub-region.

methodsA four-arm single blind household-randomized design was chosen as coils emanate insecticide throughout the household. Households enrolled at baseline were randomly allocated by the lottery method to one of the four intervention arms: (i) nothing, (ii) 0.03% transfluthrin coils alone, (iii) deltamethrin long-lasting insecticide treated nets, (LLINs) alone or (iv) a combination of transfluthrin coils and deltamethrin LLINs. All household members were recruited to the study, with only those households excluded with pregnant or breastfeeding mothers, members with chest complaints or allergies or members that regularly slept away from home. The main outcome of interest was Plasmodium falciparum malaria prevalence detected by rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) during six repeated monthly cross-sectional surveys. The secondary outcome of interest was the effect on Plasmodium vivax prevalence detected in the same way.

resultsA total of 2,052 households were recruited into the study, comprising 7,341 individuals The odds ratios of testing positive by RDT with P. falciparum or P. vivax were >75% lower for all intervention arms compared with the control arm. Coils alone provided 77% protection (95% CI: 50%-89%), LLINs provided 91% protection (95% CI: 72%-97%) and the combination of coils and LLINs provided 94% protection (95% CI: 77%-99%) against P. falciparum compared with the control arm. There was no statistically significant difference between the protective efficacies of the different interventions.

conclusionsThis is the first robust clinical evaluation of transfluthrin mosquito coils as a means to reduce malaria and the high degree of infection prevented would indicate they represent a potentially highly effective tool, which could be integrated into larger vector control programmes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00442442, March 2007.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolChinaCyclopropanesFemaleFluorobenzenesHumansIncidenceInsecticidesInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalaria, VivaxMaleMiddle AgedCyclopropanesFluorobenzenesInsecticidestransfluthrin

Identifiers

PMID24885993
PMCPMC4057598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.