Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24885970›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2014

HIV vaccine acceptability among high-risk drug users in Appalachia: a cross-sectional study.

April M Young, Ralph J DiClemente, Daniel S Halgin, Claire E Sterk, Jennifer R Havens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

April M YoungDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, 111 Washington Avenue, Lexington, Kentucky 40536, USA. april.young@uky.edu.
Ralph J DiClemente
Daniel S Halgin
Claire E Sterk
Jennifer R Havens

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000117 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$13.3M
Examining the Impact of the Twin Epidemics of Methamphetamine and Opioid Use on Overdose, Risky Sex and Treatment Engagement among PWUD in Two Rural Appalachian CohortsR01DA033862 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Jennifer R Havens · 2012 to 2026
$6.9M
Social networks and HIV risk among rural drug usersR01DA024598 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HAVENS, JENNIFER R · 2008 to 2012
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000117NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000117NIDA NIH HHS R01DA024598NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033862NIDA NIH HHS R01DA033862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA vaccine could substantially impact the HIV epidemic, but inadequate uptake is a serious concern. Unfortunately, people who use drugs, particularly those residing in rural communities, have been underrepresented in previous research on HIV vaccine acceptability. This study examined HIV vaccine acceptability among high-risk drug users in a rural community in the United States.

methodsInterviewer-administered questionnaires included questions about risk behavior and attitudes toward HIV vaccination from 433 HIV-negative drug users (76% with history of injection) enrolled in a cohort study in Central Appalachia. HIV vaccine acceptability was measured on a 4-point Likert scale. Generalized linear mixed models were used to determine correlates to self-report of being "very likely" to receive a 90% effective HIV vaccine (i.e. "maximum vaccine acceptability", or MVA). Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported.

resultsMost (91%) reported that they would accept a preventive HIV vaccine, but concerns about cost, dosing, transportation constraints, vaccine-induced seropositivity, and confidentiality were expressed. Cash incentives, oral-administration, and peer/partner encouragement were anticipated facilitators of uptake. In multivariate analysis, men were significantly less likely to report MVA (AOR: 0.33, CI: 0.21 - 0.52). MVA was more common among participants who believed that they were susceptible to HIV (AOR: 2.31, CI: 1.28 - 4.07), that an HIV vaccine would benefit them (AOR: 2.80, CI: 1.70 - 4.64), and who had positive experiential attitudes toward HIV vaccination (AOR: 1.85, CI: 1.08 - 3.17). MVA was also more common among participants who believed that others would encourage them to get vaccinated and anticipated that their behavior would be influenced by others' encouragement (AOR: 1.81, 95% 1.09 - 3.01).

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this study was among the first to explore and provide evidence for feasibility of HIV vaccination in a rural, high-risk population in the United States. This study provides preliminary evidence that gender-specific targeting in vaccine promotion may be necessary to promoting vaccine uptake in this setting, particularly among men. The data also underscore the importance of addressing perceived risks and benefits, social norms, and logistical constraints in efforts to achieve widespread vaccine coverage in this high-risk population.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesDrug UsersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAppalachian RegionCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPatient Acceptance of Health CareAIDS Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID24885970
PMCPMC4065595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.