Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24885933›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2014

Towards the clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics in bipolar disorder.

Naji C Salloum, Michael J McCarthy, Susan G Leckband, John R Kelsoe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pharmacogenomics in Psychiatry Practice: The Value and the Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetics of Bipolar Disorder: Recent Update and Future Directions.The Psychiatric clinics of North America · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Naji C Salloum
Michael J McCarthy
Susan G Leckband
John R KelsoeDepartment of Psychiatry (0603), University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. jkelsoe@ucsd.edu.

Funding

San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR000100 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S · 2012 to 2015
$19.7M
Pharmacogenomics of Mood Stabilizer Response in Bipolar DisorderU01MH092758 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KELSOE, JOHN R. · 2010 to 2014
$6.2M
The Bipolar Genome StudyR01MH094483 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CRAIG, DAVID W, EDENBERG, HOWARD J · 2012 to 2014
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000100NIMH NIH HHS MH092758NIMH NIH HHS MH094483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBipolar disorder (BD) is a psychiatric illness defined by pathological alterations between the mood states of mania and depression, causing disability, imposing healthcare costs and elevating the risk of suicide. Although effective treatments for BD exist, variability in outcomes leads to a large number of treatment failures, typically followed by a trial and error process of medication switches that can take years. Pharmacogenetic testing (PGT), by tailoring drug choice to an individual, may personalize and expedite treatment so as to identify more rapidly medications well suited to individual BD patients. DISCUSSION: A number of associations have been made in BD between medication response phenotypes and specific genetic markers. However, to date clinical adoption of PGT has been limited, often citing questions that must be answered before it can be widely utilized. These include: What are the requirements of supporting evidence? How large is a clinically relevant effect? What degree of specificity and sensitivity are required? Does a given marker influence decision making and have clinical utility? In many cases, the answers to these questions remain unknown, and ultimately, the question of whether PGT is valid and useful must be determined empirically. Towards this aim, we have reviewed the literature and selected drug-genotype associations with the strongest evidence for utility in BD. SUMMARY: Based upon these findings, we propose a preliminary panel for use in PGT, and a method by which the results of a PGT panel can be integrated for clinical interpretation. Finally, we argue that based on the sufficiency of accumulated evidence, PGT implementation studies are now warranted. We propose and discuss the design for a randomized clinical trial to test the use of PGT in the treatment of BD.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineAlgorithmsAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsBipolar DisorderGenetic MarkersGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansLithium CompoundsMalePhenotypeResearch DesignSensitivity and SpecificityTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsGenetic MarkersLithium Compounds

Identifiers

PMID24885933
PMCPMC4039055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.