Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24885889›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2014

Efficacy of a modern neuroscience approach versus usual care evidence-based physiotherapy on pain, disability and brain characteristics in chronic spinal pain patients: protocol of a randomized clinical trial.

Mieke Dolphens, Jo Nijs, Barbara Cagnie, Mira Meeus, Nathalie Roussel, Jeroen Kregel, Anneleen Malfliet, Guy Vanderstraeten, Lieven Danneels

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02098005 nacompletednot on this map

A Modern Neuroscience Approach to Chronic Spinal Pain: Pain Neuroscience Education Combined With Cognition-targeted Motor Control Training

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity GhentRan2014 to 2016Enrolled120ConditionsChronic Spinal PainArmsusual care evidence-based physiotherapy, modern neuroscience approach
NCT02630732 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Back School or Brain School for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Lumbar Radiculopathy? A Randomized Controlled Trial With Two-year Follow-up

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitair Ziekenhuis BrusselRan2016 to 2021Enrolled120ConditionsLumbar RadiculopathyArmsBrain school, Back school
NCT03239938 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Contemporary Pain Neuroscience Compared to Usual Care Evidence-based Physiotherapy Applied to Chronic Pain in Patients With Chronic Whiplash Associated Disorders: Can we Decrease Central Sensitization?

TypeinterventionalSponsorVrije Universiteit BrusselRan2017 to 2022Enrolled120ConditionsWhiplashArmsModern pain neuroscience approach, Usual care evidence-based physiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mieke DolphensDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Campus Heymans (UZ, 3B3), De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. Mieke.Dolphens@UGent.be.
Jo Nijs
Barbara Cagnie
Mira Meeus
Nathalie Roussel
Jeroen Kregel
Anneleen Malfliet
Guy Vanderstraeten
Lieven Danneels
Ghent University · BEGhent University Hospital · BEPain in Motion · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong the multiple conservative modalities, physiotherapy is a commonly utilized treatment modality in managing chronic non-specific spinal pain. Despite the scientific progresses with regard to pain and motor control neuroscience, treatment of chronic spinal pain (CSP) often tends to stick to a peripheral biomechanical model, without targeting brain mechanisms. With a view to enhance clinical efficacy of existing physiotherapeutic treatments for CSP, the development of clinical strategies targeted at 'training the brain' is to be pursued. Promising proof-of-principle results have been reported for the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach to CSP when compared to usual care, but confirmation is required in a larger, multi-center trial with appropriate evidence-based control intervention and long-term follow-up.The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach, compared to usual care evidence-based physiotherapy, for reducing pain and improving functioning in patients with CSP. A secondary objective entails examining the effectiveness of the modern neuroscience approach versus usual care physiotherapy for normalizing brain gray matter in patients with CSP. METHODS/

designThe study is a multi-center, triple-blind, two-arm (1:1) randomized clinical trial with 1-year follow-up. 120 CSP patients will be randomly allocated to either the experimental (receiving pain neuroscience education followed by cognition-targeted motor control training) or the control group (receiving usual care physiotherapy), each comprising of 3 months treatment. The main outcome measures are pain (including symptoms and indices of central sensitization) and self-reported disability. Secondary outcome measures include brain gray matter structure, motor control, muscle properties, and psychosocial correlates. Clinical assessment and brain imaging will be performed at baseline, post-treatment and at 1-year follow-up. Web-based questionnaires will be completed at baseline, after the first 3 treatment sessions, post-treatment, and at 6 and 12-months follow-up. DISCUSSION: Findings may provide empirical evidence on: (1) the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach to CSP for reducing pain and improving functioning, (2) the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach for normalizing brain gray matter in CSP patients, and (3) factors associated with therapy success. Hence, this trial might contribute towards refining guidelines for good clinical practice and might be used as a basis for health authorities' recommendations.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02098005.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesAdolescentAdultAgedBrainChronic PainDouble-Blind MethodEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24885889
PMCPMC4028010
OpenAlexW2120209595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.